arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.06904

The Nocturnity Scale: Measuring the Sense of Being at Night in Virtual Urban Environments

Anthony Le Gourri{é}rec·Etienne Peillard·Nicolas Houel·Myriam Servi{è}res
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Nighttime environments are increasingly used in virtual urban studies, yet darkness alone does not fully recreate the subjective sense of being at night. Prior work suggests that this experience depends not only on the absence of daylight, but also on lighting structure, low-light perception, human activity, soundscape, and self-related states. However, no existing tool directly assesses this scene-dependent subjective experience. This work introduces nocturnity as the feeling of being at night elicited by a scene and proposes a theory-driven framework structured into three subscales: perceptual, activity, and inner-state nocturnity. Based on this framework, we develop a first candidate questionnaire for virtual urban environments. Developed through a literature-informed process and reviewed by two urban lighting experts, the scale comprises 42 Likert-type items, including three diagnostic subscales and complementary global and time-related items. This work provides a first operational basis for comparing virtual urban scenes according to their perceived nocturnity and supports future empirical validation.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony Le Gourri{é}rec, Etienne Peillard, Nicolas Houel, Myriam Servi{è}res. 2026-08-07. The Nocturnity Scale: Measuring the Sense of Being at Night in Virtual Urban Environments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06904

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Conversations in Space: Non-Linear LLM Interaction in Everyday Use

As LLM conversations grow, their histories capture alternative directions, decisions, and evolving lines of thought that can be difficult to navigate through chat alone. We investigate an interaction concept that represents the same conversation through two synchronized views: a familiar linear chat for ongoing dialogue and a spatial canvas for navigating its emerging structure. To investigate this interaction concept, we developed CanvasConvo, which allows conversations to branch into alternative paths that remain accessible across both views. In a five-day field deployment with 24 participants, we examined how people appropriated this parallel representation in self-directed knowledge work. Participants selectively moved between the two views rather than replacing chat with the canvas. Chat remained central to conversational interaction, while the canvas supported overview, revisitation, and exploration of alternatives. Adoption was uneven, revealing challenges around established chat habits, transitions between representations, and understanding branch context. Our findings inform the design of user interfaces for LLMs that combine linear and non-linear conversation representations.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Analysis of Types of Inquiries in Student-AI Interaction: A case study of two CS2 tasks

Background and Context: Question and inquiry are integral parts of knowledge seeking and learning. Despite their importance, students tend not to ask enough questions in the classroom. However, studies have shown that students interact extensively with generative AI systems for learning and problem solving. Objective: In this paper, we seek to better understand the types of questions that students ask AI systems, and how those questions evolve during problem solving and across tasks. Method: We use the Graesser et al. taxonomy to classify students' inquiries into 18 types. We develop a few-shot learning approach to automatically classify students' interactions with AI into these categories. We use this system to analyze 830 interactions of CS2 students across two programming tasks. Findings: Our results suggest that a small subset of question types accounts for the majority of student inquiries, and that the types of questions students ask change substantially as the task progresses.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

How a Chatbot's Response Style Shapes a Classroom: A Multi-Agent Simulation of Students Consulting AI

Chatbots built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as confidants. Tuned to satisfy users, they may answer with excessive empathy and affirmation that fosters dependence, and how the states and relationships of many users co-evolve under repeated consultation is hard to observe in real settings. We build a virtual classroom of 20 student agents who interact through rule-based chats, quarrels and consultations with friends and, when stressed, may instead consult a counselor AI (Gemini 2.5 Flash) under one of six style prompts: affirming, listening, solution-oriented, reality-redirecting, inciting and blaming. A second LLM call turns each exchange into updates of five state variables (stress, happiness, self-reliance, sociability, AI dependence) without seeing the prompt. We compare the seven conditions, including a no-AI control, over 15 and 50 days and under a lower consultation threshold, and test the robustness of the 50-day comparison with a pre-specified protocol: the same block in ten independent classrooms, repeated LLM realizations of one classroom with its event stream fixed, and evaluator updates scaled by 0.3 and 0.1. In every classroom the affirming and inciting prompts ended with lower self-reliance and higher AI dependence than the control, and the listening, reality-redirecting, inciting and blaming prompts with higher stress, lower happiness and more non-attendance; the solution-oriented prompt did not differ consistently from the control. The robust self-reliance and AI-dependence differences kept their signs at the 0.3 scale with highly similar rankings (Spearman 0.89, 0.93); the stress and happiness rankings did not, and the affirming prompt's lower stress reversed its sign. All quantities are simulation state variables, not effects on users. We specify the agent dynamics completely and discuss the limits of an LLM as generator of state updates.

cs.HC↗