Refuting a Conjecture of Umans and Wang on Arithmetic-Progression Divisor Covers

Abstract

An \emph{$n$-divisor set} is a finite set of positive integers containing a multiple of every integer from $1$ through $n$. Umans and Wang proposed, as the arithmetic-progression version of their Strong $(α,β)$-Divisor Conjecture, an $n$-divisor arithmetic progression having at most $n^{2β}$ terms, each of magnitude at most $\exp(n^α)$. We prove unconditionally that an $n$-divisor arithmetic progression of height $H$ with $\log H=o(\sqrt n)$ must have length \[ L\ge \left(\sqrt{\frac{8}{27}}-o(1)\right) \frac{n^{3/4}}{\sqrt{\log n}}. \] Consequently, the arithmetic-progression version is false whenever $α<1/2$ and $β<3/8$. In particular, it is false at the proposed point $(α,β)=(1/3,1/3)$, even if both bounds are relaxed by $n^{o(1)}$ at the exponent level. The proof uses primes in a fixed band below $\sqrt n$ to turn semiprime divisibility into a finite incidence structure. An elementary bounded-degree linear-space estimate then gives the result. This theorem concerns the one-dimensional arithmetic-progression version only; it does not disprove the higher-rank Strong Divisor Conjecture.