arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.06387

Technology Transfer Readiness, Explainable AI and Financial Innovation Capability Transitions in Expanded BRICS: Benchmarking Against Advanced Innovation Economies

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of technology transfer readiness and financial innovation capability transitions across the expanded BRICS economies, benchmarked against advanced innovation systems through explainable AI. Using a composite Innovation Capability Development-Readiness index (ICDI) constructed through principal component analysis, the paper evaluates the structural conditions enabling knowledge diffusion, industrial upgrading, and financial innovation ecosystem development. A Markov transition framework is employed to analyse how countries evolve across readiness tiers over time, capturing both persistence and mobility in innovation capabilities. The results reveal significant asymmetries in transition probabilities between advanced economies and emerging innovation systems, with several BRICS economies demonstrating gradual upgrading trajectories while others remain structurally locked in lower readiness states. These findings highlight the institutional and policy conditions required to strengthen technology transfer ecosystems. Successful countries in these areas attract foreign investment, participate in global value chains, and profit from technology partnerships. The study contributes to the literature on innovation capability formation and industrial transformation by integrating composite readiness measurement with dynamic transition modelling to inform evidence-based innovation policy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Manoj Kumar, Prashanth BS, Ariful Hoque, Nasser Al Muraqab, Immanuel Azaad Moonesar, Udo Christian Braendle, Ananth Rao. 2026-07-25. Technology Transfer Readiness, Explainable AI and Financial Innovation Capability Transitions in Expanded BRICS: Benchmarking Against Advanced Innovation Economies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06387

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM