arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.03951

Improved Euclidean Shallow Light Trees

Abstract

For parameters $\alpha,\beta \geq 1$, a spanning tree $T$ of a weighted graph $G$ rooted at a designated vertex $r$ is called an $(\alpha,\beta)$-shallow-light tree (SLT) if (i) for every vertex $v$, $d_T(r,v) \leq \alpha \cdot d_G(r,v)$ (root-stretch $\alpha$), and (ii) $w(T) \leq \beta \cdot w(\mathsf{MST})$ (lightness $\beta$). The pioneering work of Khuller, Raghavachari, and Young (SODA 1993) constructed $\left(1+\epsilon, \tfrac{2}{\epsilon}+1\right)$-SLTs for general weighted graphs, and proved that this tradeoff between root-stretch and lightness is tight even for series-parallel graphs. They further asked whether even a slight improvement, namely reducing the lightness to $\tfrac{2-c}{\epsilon}$ for any constant $c>0$, is possible in the Euclidean plane. We resolve this longstanding question in the affirmative. Specifically, we show that every Euclidean instance admits an SLT with root-stretch $1+\epsilon$ and lightness at most $\left(\frac{5}{3} + o_\epsilon(1)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\epsilon}$, thereby significantly improving upon the longstanding $2/\epsilon$ barrier. As our second main result, we provide a construction of SLTs in the Euclidean plane, with root stretch $1+\epsilon$ and lightness at most $\left(\frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{4\pi^2+1}}+o_\epsilon(1)\right)\frac{1}{\epsilon} \approx (0.987+o_\epsilon(1))\frac{1}{\epsilon}$. Notably, this reduces the leading $2/\epsilon$ term in the lightness bound by more than a factor of two, and comes quite close to the lower bound of $\left(\frac{2\pi}{2\pi+1} +o_\epsilon(1))\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\epsilon} \approx (0.862 +o_\epsilon(1))\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ by Elkin and Solomon (FOCS 2011).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hung Le, Shay Solomon, Cuong Than, Csaba D. Tóth, Tianyi Zhang. 2026-08-04. Improved Euclidean Shallow Light Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03951

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG