arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.01527

What Multichoice Values Cannot See: The Information Content of Anonymous Values for Games with Graded Participation

Abstract

In a cooperative game with graded participation, each of $n$ players acts at one of $m$ ordered levels; multichoice games, voting with abstention, and graded feature attribution all take this form. We determine exactly what the entire family of linear, player-symmetric values, power indices, and importance measures proposed for this setting, present and future, can and cannot see, for all $m$ at once. The mechanism is short: the functional computing any one player's payoff under an anonymous value is invariant under permutations of the other $n-1$ players, and by the branching rule such invariants exist only in the Specht constituents $(n)$ and $(n-1,1)$ of $(\mathbb{C}^m)^{\otimes n}$. Consequences: the joint information of all anonymous values is a component of dimension polynomial in $n$ against an $m^n$-dimensional game space, with the classical binary theory as the $m=2$ shadow. Three players can hide: for $m\ge3$ the blind space is nonzero already at $n=3$, and the first invisible constituent is not a correlation but a chirality, realized by two distinct monotone abstention-voting rules on three voters that every anonymous power index scores identically. For $n\ge4$ the blind space is spanned by $\pm1$ games on four profiles each. Order-$d$ interaction probes see exactly the partitions with at most $d$ cells outside the first row, with full recovery only at $d=n-\lceil n/m\rceil$. Audit evasion gets easier than in the binary theory: a coalition of $c$ players evades every order-$d$ audit iff $c-\lceil c/m\rceil\ge d+1$, so with three or more levels, trios can restructure invisibly to every value-based payment scheme. Algorithmically, the visible part of a game is a polynomial-size, cheaply estimable sketch, while exact computation of any full-support value requires all $m^n-1$ nonzero queries. All dimension and rank claims are verified computationally.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthew Fried. 2026-08-02. What Multichoice Values Cannot See: The Information Content of Anonymous Values for Games with Graded Participation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT