arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.28555

Sequent-style tableaux for first-order logic: structural analysis, cut admissibility, and the correspondence with LK

Abstract

We give a self-contained development of the first-order block calculus in unsigned sequent-style notation: each node of the refutation tree carries a finite block $\Pi = \Gamma \cup \neg[\Delta]$, negation is governed by explicit rules, and a branch closes on a complementary pair of literals. The calculus is Smullyan's, and so in substance are the theorems; what is offered here is a different arrangement of them. The structural properties are established in the order of dependence familiar from G3-style sequent calculi: closure on arbitrary formulae is admissible, weakening and the substitution of parameters are admissible with preservation of the height, every rule is height-preserving invertible, and cut is admissible, the last being derived from the first three rather than conversely. Soundness, completeness under a fair strategy, countable compactness and the countable model property follow, together with a syntactic criterion under which every fair construction terminates. The correspondence is then proved, in both directions and with cut included, with Gentzen's LK in its usual presentation with explicit weakening, which requires lemmas on parameters that set-based Gentzen systems do not need.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Simone Cuconato. 2026-07-30. Sequent-style tableaux for first-order logic: structural analysis, cut admissibility, and the correspondence with LK. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28555

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO