arXiv · 2607.27651
Held-out evidence resolves follow-up measurement decisions in biological screens
Abstract
Machine learning determines which follow-up measurements biological screens collect. In a six-rule Cell Painting battery, the highest-value rule would re-image 96.01% of the library and had a 97.14% false-activation upper bound, showing why predicted value alone cannot justify replacing a fixed plan. We developed OPAL, a held-out decision test that freezes a rule and judges unnecessary measurement, coverage and value after cost against archive-specific criteria fixed before final evaluation. A development-selected sparse Cell Painting rule had 18.2-fold lower added-well burden, but its false-discovery bound exceeded 35%, so the fixed plan remained. LINCS--LJP favored broad acquisition under point-estimate criteria set during development, not selective saving. CTRP required fallback because its frozen score missed measured opportunity. OPAL separates optimization from evidence sufficient to change an experiment.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jia Bi, Samuel Pinilla, Chenyang Zhu. 2026-09-01. Held-out evidence resolves follow-up measurement decisions in biological screens. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27651
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
Discover connections
Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.