Doubly Robust Estimators of Quantile Treatment Effects With Semiparametric Cumulative Probability Models

Hao Wu; Chun Li; Bryan E. Shepherd

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.27633

Doubly Robust Estimators of Quantile Treatment Effects With Semiparametric Cumulative Probability Models

Hao Wu·Chun Li·Bryan E. Shepherd

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The causal inference literature has traditionally focused on estimating the mean of the potential outcome, whereas evaluating how a treatment affects the entire outcome distribution can provide additional information in biomedical research. Quantile treatment effect (QTE) captures such distributional differences, particularly when outcomes are skewed. However, existing approaches for estimating QTE make distributional assumptions about the outcome and are thus sensitive to model misspecification. Motivated by an HIV study with skewed outcomes, one of which is subject to detection limits, we propose a doubly robust framework for estimating QTE based on the cumulative probability model (CPM), which is a rank-based, semiparametric linear transformation model. We develop two CPM-based estimation strategies: (1) an inverse-cumulative distribution function (CDF) approach that first estimates the marginal CDF of potential outcomes using the efficient influence function (EIF) and then obtains marginal quantiles via weighted quantile interpolation by inverting the distribution, and (2) a direct approach that solves the EIF of potential marginal quantiles. The proposed estimators are doubly robust and asymptotically normal. We further extend the framework to probability treatment effects (PTEs) and their conditional counterparts. For statistical inference, we investigate several variance estimation procedures, including EIF-based estimators, sandwich estimators, and the nonparametric bootstrap. Simulation studies illustrate that the empirical sandwich estimator and the nonparametric bootstrap provide doubly robust variance estimation with stable finite-sample performance under nuisance model misspecification. The proposed methods are evaluated through extensive Monte Carlo simulations and illustrated using an HIV data application.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Hao Wu, Chun Li, Bryan E. Shepherd. 2026-07-30. Doubly Robust Estimators of Quantile Treatment Effects With Semiparametric Cumulative Probability Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27633

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗