arXiv · 2607.27039
Forcing and duality-corrected contracts for volatility control
Abstract
In this paper, we revisit the construction of optimal incentives in continuous-time principal-agent problems with drift and volatility control. Originally, a general approach relying on dynamic programming and second-order backward stochastic differential equations (2BSDEs) was developed by Cvitani\'c, Possama\"i, and Touzi (2018) [8] to determine the optimal form of contracts in this setting. More recently, Chiusolo and Hubert (2026) [5] proposed a BSDE-based approach by introducing an alternative `contractible-volatility' problem for the principal. In addition to the proposed new method, this work highlights that the optimality result of [8] actually hinges on an assumption, stated below as Assumption 2.3, which may not hold in general. Motivated by this, we introduce in this paper a more general class of contracts, parametrised by a function $\psi$ subject to conditions that make the contract revealing for the agent and without loss of generality for the principal. We further provide two natural specifications of $\psi$: one, inspired by the BSDE approach, yielding a forcing-type contract; the other, motivated by the 2BSDE approach, correcting the duality gap when Assumption 2.3 is not satisfied.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Alessandro Chiusolo, Emma Hubert, Dylan Possamaï, Nizar Touzi. 2026-07-29. Forcing and duality-corrected contracts for volatility control. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27039
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.