Length-Constrained Network Design in Planar Digraphs

Chandra Chekuri; Rhea Jain

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.25811

Length-Constrained Network Design in Planar Digraphs

Chandra Chekuri·Rhea Jain

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study length-constrained generalizations of Directed Steiner Tree (DST) and Directed Steiner Forest (DSF) in planar digraphs. In both problems, the input is a directed graph with edge costs. DST asks for a min-cost subgraph connecting a root to a given set of terminals, and DSF asks for a min-cost subgraph connecting each of a given set of source-sink terminal pairs. In the length-constrained setting, each edge has both a cost and a length, and the input includes a length bound $h$; the goal is to find a min-cost subgraph connecting each terminal pair via a path of length at most $h$. Our work is motivated by a recent line of results showing that several network design problems that are traditionally hard in directed graphs admit polylogarithmic approximation ratios in planar digraphs. We give polylogarithmic bicriteria approximation algorithms for length-constrained analogues of DST and DSF in planar digraphs. Our approximation ratios match the best known for DST and DSF in planar digraphs, with an $O(\log k)$ violation of the length constraint, where $k$ denotes the number of terminals (or terminal pairs). As corollaries, we obtain polylogarithmic approximations for buy-at-bulk DST and DSF in planar digraphs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Chandra Chekuri, Rhea Jain. 2026-07-28. Length-Constrained Network Design in Planar Digraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25811

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗