arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.24519

A Negative-Control Protocol for Clinical EEG Foundation-Model Benchmarks: Dataset Identity and External-Cohort Stress Testing

Marzieh Zare
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

EEG foundation-model gains may depend on cohort, montage, or probe design. We evaluated five models on five tasks across four benchmark datasets plus Korean CAUEEG, using subject-disjoint validation where identifiers exist. CAUEEG is recording-level with an annotated no-overlap held-out sensitivity. On matched CAUEEG normal/mild cognitive impairment/dementia classification (1,187 recordings), classical features reached 0.734 macro-AUROC (enhanced sensitivity: 0.736), versus BIOT-bipolar16 0.677, CBraMod 0.669, and REVE 0.568. The annotated no-overlap held-out subset preserved the classical-over-REVE ordering (0.717 versus 0.565). All five encoders decoded dataset identity at 1.000 before and after in-fold PCA-50; label permutations collapsed to chance and balanced subsamples remained at 1.000. This establishes dataset membership, not a causal site, geography, or population effect. A matched fully randomly initialized encoder was descriptively higher than pretrained REVE on CAUEEG (0.667 versus 0.570), and correct- versus scrambled-source-label LoRA runs yielded numerically similar AUROCs in unmatched descriptive sensitivities, not label-effect estimates or equivalence tests. On CHB-MIT cross-subject ictal detection, REVE reached 0.793 AUROC, versus 0.739 for the best tested enhanced nonlinear comparator, 0.691 for fully random initialization, and 0.505 for raw-signal random features. The paired REVE-minus-enhanced-comparator difference was +5.38 percentage points (95% CI -0.36 to +11.22), so comparator superiority remains unresolved; an amplitude-aware comparator also cannot be reconstructed from the retained normalized inputs. We distill montage matching, patient-overlap checks, stronger comparators, and representation controls into a reporting protocol for clinical EEG foundation-model studies.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIcs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marzieh Zare. 2026-08-13. A Negative-Control Protocol for Clinical EEG Foundation-Model Benchmarks: Dataset Identity and External-Cohort Stress Testing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24519

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Regularized Statistical Learning in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space With Non-Stationary Data

We study recursive regularized learning algorithms in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) with non-stationary online data streams. We introduce the concept of a random Tikhonov regularization path and decompose the tracking error of the algorithm's output for the regularization path into random difference equations in RKHS. We show that the tracking error vanishes in mean square and almost surely if the regularization path is slowly time-varying. Then, leveraging the monotonicity of inverse operators and the spectral decomposition of compact operators, and introducing the RKHS persistence of excitation condition, we develop a dominated convergence method to prove the mean square and almost sure consistency between the regularization path and the unknown function to be learned. Especially, for independent and non-identically distributed data streams, the mean square and almost sure consistency between the algorithm's output and the unknown function is achieved if the input data's marginal probability measures are slowly time-varying and the average measure over each fixed-length time period is uniformly above a strictly positive finite Borel measure.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Reflective Policy Optimization

On-policy reinforcement learning methods, like Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), often demand extensive data per update, leading to sample inefficiency. This paper introduces Reflective Policy Optimization (RPO), a novel on-policy extension that amalgamates past and future state-action information for policy optimization. This approach empowers the agent for introspection, allowing modifications to its actions within the current state. Theoretical analysis confirms that policy performance is monotonically improved and contracts the solution space, consequently expediting the convergence procedure. Empirical results demonstrate RPO's feasibility and efficacy in two reinforcement learning benchmarks, culminating in superior sample efficiency. The source code of this work is available at https://github.com/Edgargan/RPO.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Transductive Off-policy Proximal Policy Optimization

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is a popular model-free reinforcement learning algorithm, esteemed for its simplicity and efficacy. However, due to its inherent on-policy nature, its proficiency in harnessing data from disparate policies is constrained. This paper introduces a novel off-policy extension to the original PPO method, christened Transductive Off-policy PPO (ToPPO). Herein, we provide theoretical justification for incorporating off-policy data in PPO training and prudent guidelines for its safe application. Our contribution includes a novel formulation of the policy improvement lower bound for prospective policies derived from off-policy data, accompanied by a computationally efficient mechanism to optimize this bound, underpinned by assurances of monotonic improvement. Comprehensive experimental results across six representative tasks underscore ToPPO's promising performance.

cs.LG↗