arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.24301

Discrete time phased Petri box calculus dtphPBC

Abstract

We propose discrete time phased Petri box calculus (dtphPBC), an extension with phase type distributed multiaction delays of discrete time stochastic and deterministic Petri box calculus (dtsdPBC), previously presented by I.V. Tarasyuk. In dtphPBC, transition probability matrices (TPMs) of finite absorbing discrete time Markov chains (DTMCs) with a single absorbing state specify discrete phase type (DPH) distributed delays (including zero delay) of the phased multiactions that generalize stochastic and deterministic multiactions from dtsdPBC. The positively phased (timed) multiactions have positive DPH delays represented by the non-empty TPM matrices over transient states (transient TPMs). The zero phased (immediate) multiactions have zero DPH delay represented by the empty transient TPM. The step operational semantics of dtphPBC is constructed via labeled probabilistic transition systems. The transition systems incorporate the absorbing DTMCs of the DPH delays of the executed phased multiactions via the structural operational semantics (SOS) rules. The SOS rules define a labeling with the empty set on the transitions among transient states of the absorbing DTMC and on the self-loop in the absorbing state of it. The transitions going from the transient states (positive phases) to the absorbing state (zero phase) are labeled with the executions, being the positive phases-superscribed timed multiactions whose (positive) delays are defined by the absorbing DTMC. A series of examples demonstrates how to construct the transition systems of the dynamic expressions, combined from timed and immediate multiactions with different operations of the calculus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Igor V. Tarasyuk. 2026-07-27. Discrete time phased Petri box calculus dtphPBC. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24301

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

PICID: Proof-Driven Clause Learning in Neural Network Verification

Current Deep Neural Network (DNN) verifiers are typically designed to prioritize scalability over reliability. Reliability can be reinforced through the generation of proofs that are checkable by trusted, external proof checkers. To date, only a handful of verifiers support proof production; and these rely on verifier-specific formats, and balance between scalability, proof detail, and the trustworthiness of their proof checker. In this tool paper, we introduce PICID, a DNN verifier that produces proofs in the standard Alethe format for SMT solving, checkable by an independent checker. PICID implements a parallel CDCL(T) architecture that integrates the state-of-the-art, proof-producing CaDiCaL SAT solver with the Marabou DNN verifier. Furthermore, PICID leverages UNSAT proofs to derive conflict clauses. Our evaluation shows that PICID generates valid proofs in the vast majority of cases and significantly outperforms existing tools that produce comparable proofs.

cs.LO

Confluence of conditional rewriting modulo

Sets of equations E play an important computational role in rewriting-based systems R. The equivalence relation =E induced by E introduces a partition of terms into E-equivalence classes on which rewriting computations, denoted ->R/E and called rewriting modulo E, are issued. This paper investigates confluence of ->R/E, usually called E-confluence, for conditional rewriting-based systems, where rewriting steps are determined by conditional rules. We rely on Jouannaud and Kirchner's framework to investigate confluence of an abstract relation R modulo an abstract equivalence relation E on a set A. We show how to particularize such a framework to be used with conditional systems. Then, we show how to define appropriate finite sets of conditional pairs to prove and disprove E-confluence. We introduce (i) Logic-based Conditional Critical Pairs, which do not require the use of (often infinitely many) E-unifiers to provide a finite representation of the local peaks considered in the abstract framework. We also introduce (ii) parametric Conditional Variable Pairs which are essential to deal with conditional rules in the analysis of E-confluence. Finally, we introduce (iii) Down Conditional Pairs which are often necessary to disprove E-confluence. Our results apply to well-known classes of rewriting-based systems, improving on previous results. As for unconditional systems, our results apply to Equational Term Rewriting Systems, first investigated by Huet and then by Jouannaud, and Jouannaud and Kirchner, among others. As for conditional systems, our results also apply to conditional rewrite theories and Maude.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. Therefore, we contribute a framework for verified numerical methods in Isabelle/HOL based on ITrees. Our user-friendly specification language enables the direct declaration of numerical programs that can be annotated with variants and invariants for reasoning about correctness specifications. The generated verification conditions can be discharged via automated proof methods and lemmas from the HOL-Analysis library. The ITrees foundation interacts with Isabelle's code generator to export source code. This provides an end-to-end path from formal specifications with machine-checked guarantees to executable sources. We illustrate the process of modelling numerical methods and demonstrate the effectiveness of the verification by focusing on two well-known methods, the bisection method and the fixed-point iteration method. We also contribute crucial extensions to the libraries of formalised mathematics required for this objective: higher-order derivatives and Taylor's theorem in Peano form. Finally, we qualitatively evaluate the use of the framework for verifying numerical methods.

cs.LO