arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.24031

A Cyclic Adaptation-Generalization Framework with Uncertainty-Guided Self-Paced Learning for Long-Term Brain-Machine Interfaces

Abstract

Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs), which link the brain to external devices, hold great potential in rehabilitation, human performance augmentation, and human-centered robotics. However, invasive BMIs face a critical challenge for long-term deployment due to neural drift, which degrades decoding performance over time and necessitates frequent recalibration. Existing methods designed to mitigate neural drift typically rely on either domain adaptation (DA) or domain generalization (DG) alone and often fail to capture fine-grained distribution shifts across neural subdomains, resulting in limited performance. To overcome these limitations, we propose Uncertainty-guided Self-paced Cycling (UnSPC), a robust framework that synergizes DA and DG for target domain refining under an Uncertainty-guided Self-paced Pseudo-labeling (UnSPL) mechanism. To handle subdomain neural drift across domains, UNSPL is proposed to iteratively mine reliable pseudo-labeled samples with a noise-robust ranking strategy for further fine-tuning. Leveraging these high-quality samples, we introduce a novel Cycling Adaptation and Generalization (CycAG) strategy, which integrates DA and DG within an iterative cycle to progressively mitigate both global and subdomain drift. This cyclic process enables effective alignment to evolving target distributions while preserving robust and transferable representations, thereby mitigating performance degradation under long-term neural drifts. Extensive experiments on multiple neural decoding datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of UnSPC. To our knowledge, our proposed UnSPC is the first to cyclically integrate DA and DG with pseudo-labeling, paving the way toward stable long-term BMI controls.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jiyu Wei, Di Hong, Zhanjie Zhang, Dazhong Rong, Qinming He, Yueming Wang. 2026-07-27. A Cyclic Adaptation-Generalization Framework with Uncertainty-Guided Self-Paced Learning for Long-Term Brain-Machine Interfaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24031

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI