arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.23874

The Tiered Clinching Auction with Applications to Carbon Offset Markets

Abstract

Voluntary carbon offsetting is a strategy which has been pursued globally by corporations to reduce their effective carbon emissions. Carbon offset markets currently suffer from low liquidity: offsets are highly heterogeneous, the landscape of accreditation is fragmented, and the market lacks a centralized trading infrastructure which would provide clear demand and price signaling to producers and buyers of offsets. In this paper, we propose an ascending auction mechanism which can be applied to the sale of carbon offsets. It generalizes Ausubel's clinching auction to a setting with items of tiered quality. The central idea behind the clinching mechanism is that bidders are allocated items when their opponents' demand drops below the supply. This is generalized to multiple nested submarkets where clinching can occur in the tiered case. Assuming that bidders have a minimum quality level that they will accept but are indifferent to quality beyond that, along with having decreasing marginal utility, we obtain that the auction generates the efficient outcome and charges VCG prices. As a result, sincere bidding is a weakly dominant strategy given private values. Moreover, the auction can be implemented in polynomial time. Beyond offset markets, this auction can be applied to any market where items can be ordered on a scale and bidders have a cutoff point for desiring items on the scale, such as hotel room bookings, concert ticketing and sponsored search auctions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tessa Davis, Agnès Totschnig, Adrian Vetta. 2026-07-26. The Tiered Clinching Auction with Applications to Carbon Offset Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23874

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT