arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.23227

INT8 Quantization Makes ARM Edge Inference Dispatch-Invariant

Abstract

On x86, kernel dispatch fragments the outputs of the same neural network into many equivalence classes across hardware. We ask whether the same fragmentation governs ARM edge inference, where most edge ML actually runs. Across four Raspberry Pi devices spanning Cortex-A53, A72, and A76 under ONNX Runtime CPU, microarchitecture is not observable in the outputs of a fixed FP32 CNN. Holding hardware constant at Cortex-A76 and switching only the execution provider, FP32 outputs disagree on every CIFAR-10 image with a mean remaining precision of 14.97 of 23 mantissa bits. INT8 QDQ post-training quantization collapses both axes to a single equivalence class. We trace this to a structural property of QDQ graphs that we call H1+H2: discrete-grid inputs make any Conv dispatch-deterministic (H1) and QuantizeLinear at every layer boundary preserves that precondition (H2). H1+H2 predicts that bit-exact agreement should extend to production CNNs under runtimes that confirmably exercise different ARM microkernels. We verify this on MobileNetV2 and ResNet50V2 under TensorFlow Lite with XNNPACK, where timing evidence confirms SDOT dispatch on A76 and NEON multiply-accumulate on A72 yet every intermediate INT32 accumulator and every final output is byte-identical across 500 ImageNet images per model. We then identify the specific x86 mechanism that breaks the same invariant on x86, namely PMADDUBSW saturating INT16 intermediates, which has no ARM analogue. The Schlögl et al. divergence phenomenon is delineated rather than contradicted. For practitioners deploying quantized CNNs across heterogeneous ARM fleets, the operational consequence is direct. INT8 inference is the reproducible mode and the relevant behavioral variation axis is precision, not microarchitecture.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sebastián A. Cruz Romero, Shenied E. Maldonado Guerra. 2026-07-25. INT8 Quantization Makes ARM Edge Inference Dispatch-Invariant. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23227

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Beyond HBM-on-GPU: Thermal Design Envelope for 3D Volumetric DRAM-on-GPU Integration

The scaling of GPUs for AI and HPC workloads is increasingly constrained by the capacity, bandwidth, and thermal limits of both 2.5D HBM-GPU and direct-stacked 3D HBM-on-GPU integration. This work establishes the thermal design envelope for 3D volumetric DRAM-on-GPU integration, in which vertically oriented DRAM dies and interleaved cooling cavities reshape heat flow and memory interfacing above the GPU. Using a package-level thermal model anchored to a consistent HBM-on-GPU baseline and driven by a realistic reticle-scale non-uniform GPU power map, we quantify the key parameters governing thermal feasibility. Stack height is the dominant limiter of peak temperature, while cooling-cavity conductivity shifts the feasible region, and mold insertion and stack orientation further modulate thermal behavior. A distributed memory-controller and network-on-chip tier introduces only a moderate thermal penalty. Although die-level parallelism increases bandwidth, the reduction in simulated training time saturates once execution becomes compute-bound. These results define a bounded co-design space across bandwidth, capacity, and thermal constraints for 3D volumetric DRAM-on-GPU integration.

cs.ET

Droop-Aware Foundation Model Power Flow

This paper develops a droop-aware extension of the GridFM power systems foundation model, embedding droop gains and frequency/voltage deadband parameters as per-bus node features to enable control-aware AC power-flow analysis. Existing power-flow datasets encode only static electrical features, conflating operating points from qualitatively different control regimes; this work resolves that gap by exposing droop and deadband parameters as structured node features, with deadband discontinuities handled through a smooth tanh approximation that preserves solver differentiability. A transformer-based graph neural network is pre-trained on masked reconstruction and fine-tuned on the resulting control-aware datasets. The framework is validated against PSCAD electromagnetic-transient simulations on a two-bus system (0.11% maximum steady-state error) and cross-validated against an independent PyPower droop solver on the IEEE 24-bus RTS. On the 24-bus system the surrogate attains R2 = 0.9996 for active generation and 0.0015 p.u. voltage-magnitude RMSE; scalability is confirmed on the IEEE 300-bus system (0.0036 p.u. RMSE, R2 = 0.9841 for voltage magnitude across 299,700 predictions). A three-mode control study further shows that the deadband widens the control-error distribution while leaving total droop compensation unchanged, establishing deadband width as an actionable node-level design feature.

cs.ET

GNN-based Path-aware multi-view Circuit Learning for Technology Mapping

Traditional technology mapping suffers from systemic inaccuracies in delay estimation due to its reliance on abstract, technology-agnostic delay models that fail to capture the nuanced timing behavior behavior of real post-mapping circuits. To address this fundamental limitation, we introduce GPA(graph neural network (GNN)-based Path-Aware multi-view circuit learning), a novel GNN framework that learns precise, data-driven delay predictions by synergistically fusing three complementary views of circuit structure: And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs)-based functional encoding, post-mapping technology emphasizes critical timing paths. Trained exclusively on real cell delays extracted from critical paths of industrial-grade post-mapping netlists, GPA learns to classify cut delays with unprecedented accuracy, directly informing smarter mapping decisions. Evaluated on the 19 EPFL combinational benchmarks, GPA achieves 19.9%, 2.1% and 4.1% average delay reduction over the conventional heuristics methods (techmap, MCH) and the prior state-of-the-art ML-based approach SLAP, respectively-without compromising area efficiency.

cs.ET