Energetics of frontogenesis in simple balanced models

Abstract

Submesoscale fronts have been proposed to act as conduits funneling kinetic energy from geostrophically constrained mesoscale eddies down to small scales, where the energy can be dissipated. Realistic primitive-equation simulations suggest that the downscale energy transfer at submesoscales is strongly concentrated in sharpening fronts, with convergence on the cyclonic side playing a dominant role. This study explores how much of this phenomenology can be captured by simple quasi-geostrophic (QG) and semi-geostrophic (SG) theories of frontogenesis. An analysis of the kinetic energy budget of classical strain-induced frontogenesis shows that there is downscale transfer in both QG and SG fronts. In QG frontogenesis, the narrowing jet along the sharpening front is powered by buoyancy production, but geostrophic downscale transfer due to the strain field plays an important role. In SG frontogenesis, where frontal sharpening is accelerated by the ageostrophic cross-frontal circulation, ageostrophic advection enhances this downscale transfer on the cyclonic side of the front, where the surface flow is convergent. On the anticyclonic side, where the ageostrophic circulation is divergent, the ageostrophic scale transfer of kinetic energy is upscale and partially offsets the geostrophic downscale transfer. While matching patterns in realistic primitive-equation simulations, the ageostrophic scale transfers remain important but not dominant in the adiabatic and frictionless theory considered here. This suggests that processes absent from these theories may play an important role. For example, mixed-layer turbulence may enhance the ageostrophic circulation and the associated dipole of scale transfers. The advection of ageostrophic momentum may also be important in some circumstances.