arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.22900

Rapid evaluation and calibration of Bayesian group sequential designs via conjugate-mixture semi-simulation

Zhangyi He·Feng Yu·Suzie Cro·Laurent Billot
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Bayesian group sequential designs (GSDs) extend frequentist GSDs with interpretable decision-making and external evidence borrowing, but their use is limited by the computational burden of design-stage operating-characteristic evaluation. Conventional methods simulate virtual trials with Markov chain Monte Carlo or approximate analytical posterior updates at each interim look, making joint calibration of decision thresholds and design skeletons impractical on commodity hardware. Here we introduce a semi-simulation framework with two innovations. First, finite conjugate-mixture priors replace the posterior computation for each look (``per-look'') with closed-form conjugate updates and low-dimensional numerical integration for decision-rule tail probabilities. Second, a precomputation strategy caches per-look posterior tail probabilities from a single Monte Carlo pass at the union of all candidate analysis times, and each design in the calibration grid is evaluated against the same cache by a sub-second sweep, with no further simulation cost. The framework supports posterior-probability decision rules with multiple efficacy and futility criteria under either binding or non-binding futility, and derives closed-form per-look updates for binary, continuous, count and time-to-event endpoints, with benchmarking here focused on the binary endpoint. When applied to re-design the ADRENAL trial, with up to nine analyses, the framework reproduces the operating characteristics of BATSS and adaptr within Monte Carlo error while running, per GSD, approximately $7\times$ to $16\times$ faster than adaptr at a matched budget (several hundredfold at the million-trial calibration budget) and $3{,}700\times$ to $6{,}600\times$ faster than BATSS. This brings routine Bayesian GSD calibration within computational reach for confirmatory trials.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhangyi He, Feng Yu, Suzie Cro, Laurent Billot. 2026-07-24. Rapid evaluation and calibration of Bayesian group sequential designs via conjugate-mixture semi-simulation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22900

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗