arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.22663

Beyond Block Boundaries: Multi-Block Editing for Diffusion Large Language Models

Abstract

Block diffusion is the dominant approach for scaling discrete diffusion language models (dLLMs), as fixed-size blocks preserve parallel decoding while keeping quadratic attention costs tractable. Yet blockwise generation creates a structural weakness: tokens near a block boundary lack future cross-block context, and errors in finalized blocks become irreversible context for later generation. We call this the block boundary problem. Measuring predictions with and without later-block context shows that boundary sensitivity rises sharply: on AIME 2025, mean self-containedness divergence (SCD) in the last quarter of a block is 61.3 times that in the first quarter. We propose Multi-Block Editing (MBE), which revises decoded tokens using cross-block context. Training-Free MBE reopens a full-attention window over selected blocks without parameter updates. To address the mismatch between block-diffusion training and MBE inference, Multi-Block Edit SFT introduces bidirectional attention masks and progressively enlarges the editing span. We also extend SGLang with a multi-shape CUDA Graph pool and fine-grained KV-cache control for efficient variable-length editing. Experiments on LLaDA2.1-Mini across 12 benchmarks show broad, consistent gains. Training-Free MBE improves or matches standard decoding on every benchmark. Full MBE raises the 12-benchmark average from 61.45 to 64.24, with gains of up to 13.33 points on AIME 2025, while retaining 87.3--96.7% of standard-decoding end-to-end throughput across four datasets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xingyu Mou, Zijin Huang, Tianze Zhang, Yuxin Ma, Lanning Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Da Zheng, Lun Du. 2026-06-29. Beyond Block Boundaries: Multi-Block Editing for Diffusion Large Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22663

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI