arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.19358

LISA: Linear-Indexed Sparse Attention for Efficient Long-Context Reasoning

Abstract

Recent advances in long chain-of-thought reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1 have led to increasingly longer inference context lengths under the test-time scaling paradigm. However, the O(n^2) computational complexity of standard self-attention causes inference costs to grow sharply with long sequences, limiting the deployment of long-CoT reasoning in production settings. To address this, we propose LISA (Linear-Indexed Sparse Attention), a plug-and-play attention replacement module that requires no pretraining from scratch. LISA integrates two lightweight components in parallel within the original model: (1) a Linear Attention module that provides long-range memory with O(n) time complexity; (2) a Lightning Indexer that selects the top-M important tokens from the full context to feed into a Sparse Self-Attention. The two branches are fused via a gating mechanism, reducing inference complexity from O(n^2) to O(nM) (M << n) for generating n tokens. We design a two-stage training pipeline: Stage 1 initializes the model by integrating the linear attention to capture long-range dependencies, complemented by a sliding-window attention mechanism that is optimized via knowledge distillation to approximate the full self-attention distribution of a frozen teacher model. In Stage 2, we further introduce the Indexer to replace the static sliding-window mechanism, enabling dynamic token selection from broader contexts. The Indexer is trained using a novel per-head KL divergence loss, which aligns its selection behavior with the attention patterns of the teacher model. Experiments on DeepSeek-distilled-Qwen models demonstrate that LISA achieves a 50% inference speedup under 16K-token context, while improving average performance by 5.6% on reasoning benchmarks including AIME and MATH-500.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yu Zhao, Zekun Zhang, Fan Jiang, Bo Zeng, Linlong Xu, Shimin Shan, Yu Liu, Longyue Wang, Weihua Luo. 2026-05-29. LISA: Linear-Indexed Sparse Attention for Efficient Long-Context Reasoning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19358

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI