arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.18735

Course design in the age of AI

Benjamin Davies
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

I develop a model of learning-by-doing and course design, and use it to study the impacts of artificial intelligence (AI). A myopic student faces a sequence of tasks that he can work on or delegate to AI. Work requires costly effort but builds skill; delegation requires no effort but builds no skill. A teacher designs the task sequence ("course") to maximize the student's skill development, given his choices to work or delegate. Without AI, the teacher makes earlier tasks more effort-intensive and later tasks more skill-intensive. With AI, the teacher must redesign early tasks to induce effort, leading to less skill development. If AI complements effort, then improvements in AI quality make high-skill students learn faster but low-skill students learn slower.

Explore related subjects

econ.THcs.CY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Benjamin Davies. 2026-09-02. Course design in the age of AI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18735

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CY subjectecon.TH subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Jointly Satisfying Pareto Optimality and Justified Representation is NP-Hard in Approval-Based Multiwinner Voting

An open problem in approval-based multiwinner voting concerns whether we can efficiently compute committees that satisfy both justified representation and Pareto optimality. We answer this question negatively by proving that, on the domain of all profiles, outputting a committee satisfying both axioms is NP-hard. An initial proof was found by ChatGPT Astra. This was then verified and rewritten by the author.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

On the Complexity of Bayesian Signal Processing

We develop a computational framework for Bayesian decision-making. We show that as long as no action is optimal in every state, Bayes-optimal choice is intractable. This hardness need not arise from large action, state, or signal spaces, nor from a complicated represented utility function: extracting enough information from a hard-to-interpret signal to act optimally can itself be computationally hard. We also characterize tractability across approximation notions and identify their sources of difficulty. Under the probably approximately correct criterion, sample-based Bayesian learning is tractable if and only if the signal support is bounded. Our results provide justifications for bounded rationality, costly Bayesian inference, and sample-based Bayesian learning.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2026

A 1.283 Price-of-Anarchy Bound for the Repeated Virtual First-Price Auction

We study the repeated allocation of a single indivisible resource among $n$ strategic players. Each player $i$ has a privately known value distribution $D_i$, and values are drawn independently across players and periods. The goal is to find fair and efficient mechanisms. We apply the repeated first-price auction with equal initial endowments of virtual money. We show that each player can asymptotically secure the same fair-floor guarantee $f(D_i)$ as in Csóka 2026; consequently, the mechanism is $1.283$-optimal. This provides a simpler and more robust alternative mechanism for this special case and may also help derive sharper upper bounds on the price of anarchy.

cs.GT↗