arXiv · 2607.18114
How Does Alignment Tuning Shape Representations of Sycophancy and Related Cue-Induced Biases in LLMs?
Abstract
Modern LLMs are alarmingly susceptible to surprisingly simple immaterial changes of input prompts: a casual hint, an incorrectly labeled few-shot example, or a fake prior assistant turn often flips an originally correct answer. We study where this susceptibility, spanning sycophancy and related cue-induced biases, lives inside the model. Across five model families and seven bias types, we extract a per-bias direction from hidden states and triangulate it through three measures: probing, leave-one-dataset-out (LODO) transfer, and causal intervention. The susceptibility is largely shaped by alignment tuning rather than pretraining: pretrained base models generally cave much less to these biases, and their activations carry much weaker cue-specific signal beyond question content. Within aligned models, each bias has a coherent linear direction that we can both decode and steer along, recovering the unbiased answer across every family we test. The biases do not collapse into a single shared representation, however: cross-bias overlap is model-specific, and even behaviorally similar biases occupy different directions. The same intervention also provides a proof-of-concept debiasing tool, recovering a meaningful share of bias-induced errors while preserving most correct answers across all instruct families. Cue-induced bias is therefore best understood not as a single flaw in LLMs but as a family of causally effective linear directions that are largely shaped by alignment tuning.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Prakhar Gupta, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Florent Draye, Bernhard Schölkopf, Zhijing Jin. 2026-09-01. How Does Alignment Tuning Shape Representations of Sycophancy and Related Cue-Induced Biases in LLMs?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18114
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
Discover connections
Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.