arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.06334

Improved subexponential analysis of the Random-Action-Removal algorithm for 2-player turn-based games and non-binary AUSOs

Uri Zwick
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We give a concise description and an improved analysis of the Random-Action-Removal algorithm for solving 2-player, 0-sum, turn-based, possibly infinite duration, stochastic or non-stochastic games played on graphs, or on finite sets of states. More generally, the algorithm can be used to find the sink of an Acyclic Unique Sink Orientation (AUSO) of a non-binary hypercube. The families of games that can be solved by the algorithm include discounted and non-discounted stochastic games (SGs) and Mean Payoff Games (MPGs). The obtained algorithm is the fastest known randomized algorithm for solving such games, slightly improving on a much more complicated algorithm of Hansen and Zwick (STOC 2015). The Random-Action-Removal algorithm is an adaptation of the Random-Facet algorithm used to solve linear programming (LP) problems, or, more generally, LP-type problems. Two dual variants of the Random-Facet algorithm were developed independently by Kalai (STOC 1992) and by Matou{\v{s}}ek, Sharir and Welzl (SoCG 1992). For LP problems, the algorithm of Kalai is a primal \emph{simplex} algorithm, while the algorithm of Matou{\v{s}}ek, Sharir and Welzl is a dual \emph{simplex} algorithm. The Random-Action-Removal algorithm for games or AUSOs is an adaptation of the dual algorithm of Matou{\v{s}}ek, Sharir and Welzl, and is a randomized \emph{strategy iteration} algorithm. Our improved analysis shows that the Random-Action-Removal algorithm solves games with~$n$ states and $m\ge 2n$ actions in $e^{O(\sqrt{n\ln(m/n)})}$ time. This improves on a previous $e^{O(\sqrt{n\ln(m/\sqrt n)})}$ bound for the algorithm that follows from the analysis of Matou{\v{s}}ek, Sharir and Welzl (SoCG 1992). An $e^{O(\sqrt{n\ln(m/n)})}$ bound, with worse constant factors, was previously obtained using a much more complicated algorithm for solving LP and LP-type problems of Hansen and Zwick (STOC 2015).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Uri Zwick. 2026-07-07. Improved subexponential analysis of the Random-Action-Removal algorithm for 2-player turn-based games and non-binary AUSOs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗