Compliance Evidence in the Automotive Supply Chain: A Systematisation of the Quality-Document Spine and a Taxonomy of Documentation Failure Modes

Abstract

The automotive industry runs on a dense, standardised chain of supplier-quality and certification evidence: production part approval packages, initial sample reports, material certificates, inspection sign-offs, and the type approval dossiers. The chain is operationally central, yet no literature maps it as an information system, and its failures are studied as corporate misconduct rather than system outcomes. This paper systematises the chain and taxonomises its documented failures. First, it systematises the supplier-quality evidence chain across the two dominant regimes, AIAG PPAP and VDA Volume 2 PPA, organised by artefact, producer, verifier, trigger, approval state, and retention. Second, it compiles a compendium of thirteen compliance-documentation failures made public 2012 to 2024, built strictly from the public record and each classified by evidentiary status (adjudicated, company-acknowledged, or alleged), with the Japanese certification cluster of 2016 to 2024 as centrepiece. Third, it builds a failure-mode taxonomy over the compendium, dimensioned by mechanism, lifecycle locus, driver, and detection path, shown exhaustive and discriminating over the case set. Fourth, it derives evidence architecture requirements mechanism by mechanism and sets an open-problems agenda. Across all thirteen cases, not one failure surfaced through the chain's own routine verification; the record indicts the verification layer, not only the evidence authors.