Maximum Entropy is a 10/7-Approximation Algorithm for the TSP on Half-Integral Cycle Cut Instances

Billy Jin; Nathan Klein; David P. Williamson

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.01536

Maximum Entropy is a 10/7-Approximation Algorithm for the TSP on Half-Integral Cycle Cut Instances

Billy Jin·Nathan Klein·David P. Williamson

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the most famous conjectures in combinatorial optimization is the four-thirds conjecture, which states that the integrality gap of the Subtour LP relaxation of the TSP is equal to $\frac{4}{3}$. For 40 years, the best known upper bound was $1.5$, due to Wolsey. Recently, Karlin, Klein, and Oveis Gharan showed that the max entropy algorithm for the TSP gives an improved bound of $1.5 - 10^{-36}$. In this paper, we show that the maximum entropy algorithm is a $\frac{10}{7}$-approximation for half-integral cycle cut instances of the TSP. This class of instances contains examples which demonstrate the subtour LP has an integrality gap of at least $\frac{4}{3}$, as well as examples showing that the performance of the max entropy algorithm is no better than $\frac{11}{8}$. We note that the authors recently gave an algorithm upper bounding the integrality gap of this class of instances by $\frac{4}{3}$, so this work does not (and could not) provide an improved bound on the integrality gap. However, since there is no reason to believe that the analysis of the maximum entropy algorithm on general instances is tight, our work provides hope (and potentially direction) for improved analysis on other instance classes.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Billy Jin, Nathan Klein, David P. Williamson. 2026-07-01. Maximum Entropy is a 10/7-Approximation Algorithm for the TSP on Half-Integral Cycle Cut Instances. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01536

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗