arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.31871

On Interpretations of Normal Modal Logics

Lev V. Dvorkin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study interpretations of modal logics in one another where the Boolean connectives are interpreted identically and the modal operator diamond is interpreted by an arbitrary formula A(p). Clearly, such a formula A(p) defines an interpretation of a normal modal logic whenever A(p) is additive (that is, preserves disjunction) and normal (that is, preserves bottom) in the target logic. In the present paper, we provide a complete description of all additive and normal formulas in five prominent modal logics: K, GL, Grz, S4, and S5. For K, GL, and S5, we also describe all additive and normal formulas with parameters.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lev V. Dvorkin. 2026-06-30. On Interpretations of Normal Modal Logics. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.447.18

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Kim-forking for hyperimaginaries in NSOP1 theories

We adapt the properties of Kim-independence in NSOP1 theories with existence proven in [5],[4] and [2] by Ramsey, Kaplan, Chernikov, Dobrowolski and Kim to hyperimaginaries by adding the assumption of existence for hyperimaginaries. We show that Kim-independence over hyperimaginaries satisfies a version of Kim's lemma, symmetry, the independence theorem, transitivity and witnessing. As applications we adapt Kim's results around colinearity and weak canonical bases from [8] to hyperimaginaries and give some new results about Lascar strong types and Kim-forking using boundedly closed hyperimaginaries.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Unfriendly jump inversions

We introduce a new technique in computable structure theory which we call unfriendly jump inversions. In contrast to the standard technique of jump inversions, we obtain the maximal possible difference between the effective and non-effective settings, namely, the $n$th unfriendly jump inversion behaves like an $n$th jump inversion from the non-effective perspective, but like a $2n$th jump inversion from the effective perspective. We give several applications, among them the construction of a structure which has no arithmetic copy but which has a copy computable from every non-arithmetic set. This has been an open question in the study of degree spectra for some time. We also show that for every $n \geq 2$ there is a computable structure with a $Π_n$ Scott sentence but no computable $Σ_{2n}$ Scott sentence.

math.LO↗