Maximum Cut Algorithms and Upper Bounds for Planar and Toroidal Graphs

Mark Glass; Meir Feder

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.28478

Maximum Cut Algorithms and Upper Bounds for Planar and Toroidal Graphs

Mark Glass·Meir Feder

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We demonstrate that the problem of finding the maximum cut of a planar graph with arbitrary weights can be easily mapped to a minimum T-join problem in the absolute dual graph - the dual graph with absolute weights, as opposed to the known mapping to a maximum T-join problem with an empty set in the dual graph. By enabling the use of the shortest paths, this approach allows for the straightforward adaptation of the first efficient Max-Cut algorithm, designed by Hadlock in 1975 for planar graphs with non-negative weights, to handle the general case of planar graphs with arbitrary weights. Furthermore, we prove that applying a planar Max-Cut algorithm to a higher genus graph, such as a toroidal graph, while disregarding its topology, provides an upper bound for its maximum cut. Employing this methodology, we derive upper bounds for the maximum cut across all toroidal graphs within the GSet benchmark. We report that the known maximum cut values for part of those GSet toroidal problems including the three largest instances, which were previously documented in the literature, are the maximum possible because they match their upper bound values. Additionally, we introduce a novel heuristic algorithm for finding Max-Cut of toroidal graphs, which is based on the planar graph algorithm. Applying this algorithm to all seventeen toroidal Max-Cut problems in the GSet benchmark successfully reproduces all the best-known results, and for problem #62, it yields a new, previously unknown best Max-Cut value.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC cs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mark Glass, Meir Feder. 2026-06-26. Maximum Cut Algorithms and Upper Bounds for Planar and Toroidal Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28478

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗