arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.28070

JD Oxygen AI Item Center (Oxygen AIIC) V1: An Industrial-Scale LLM/VLM-Centric Solution for Item Understanding, Management, and Applications

Oxygen AIIC·Chan Long·Chao Liu·Chaofan Chen·Chaohui Dong·Chunyuan Guo·Danping Liu·Debin Liu·Deping Xiang·Fulai Xu·Guangyue Liu·Hao Li·Huichun Hu·Jian Yang·Jianan Wang·Jianbo Zhao·Jiaoyang Li·Jiaxing Wang·Jinglong Li·Jinjin Guo·Jun Fang·Jun Liu·Kai Zhou·Li Wang·Lili Gao·Liying Chen·Luning Yang·Mengdi Zhou·Pengzhang Liu·Qi Lv·Qianyun Wang·Qixia Jiang·Ruyue Li·Shimu Liang·Shuxing Wang·Sijie Zhang·Siqi Li·Tianhao Gao·Wang Ke·Weihu Huang·Wencan Lai·Wenjie Zhang·Xiaohui Zhang·Xiaojing Dong·Ya Liu·Yifeng Zhang·Yixiang Wang·Yongtai Zhang·Yongyi Liao·Zhaoru Chen·Zhen Chen·Zhiyong Ma·Zhiyuan Liu·Zhongwei Liu·Ziyan Xing
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

JD$.$com, one of the world's largest e-commerce platforms, serves over 700 million active users and millions of merchants, with a catalog of tens of billions of SKUs. At this scale, high-quality, structured item knowledge underpins a better consumer experience, lower management costs, and higher operational efficiency-yet producing and serving it poses three industrial-scale challenges: fast-emerging concepts, high-quality knowledge production for massive SKUs, and diverse downstream requirements. To address these challenges, we present the JD Oxygen AI Item Center (Oxygen AIIC), an industrial-scale platform built on LLMs/VLMs for item-knowledge production and service. Oxygen AIIC is built around four core pillars: (i) ontology engineering driven by efficient human-AI collaboration, which supports the dynamic evolution and agile expansion of an ontology with millions of entries; (ii) a "Semantic Search then Discrimination"(S2D) knowledge identification architecture that, combined with throughput improvement strategies, enables scalable, extensible, and high-throughput AI Item Library production for tens of billions of SKUs; (iii) self-evolving item-understanding LLMs/VLMs that improve in a stable and controllable manner, enabling knowledge production with 94.2% precision and 82.8% recall; and (iv) a unified item tunnel that serves as the data and service hub. Oxygen AIIC now covers tens of thousands of JD categories and processes hundreds of millions of item updates per day on Huawei Ascend NPUs. It has accumulated hundreds of billions of item-knowledge assets. Deployed across core business scenarios-including search, recommendation, operations, category planning-Oxygen AIIC has delivered measurable gains at scale. Search-traffic coverage reaches 80.4%, item-information quality issues drop by 37%, the automated fill rate of core attributes during item listing exceeds 80%.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Oxygen AIIC, Chan Long, Chao Liu, Chaofan Chen, Chaohui Dong, Chunyuan Guo, Danping Liu, Debin Liu, Deping Xiang, Fulai Xu, Guangyue Liu, Hao Li, Huichun Hu, Jian Yang, Jianan Wang, Jianbo Zhao, Jiaoyang Li, Jiaxing Wang, Jinglong Li, Jinjin Guo, Jun Fang, Jun Liu, Kai Zhou, Li Wang, Lili Gao, Liying Chen, Luning Yang, Mengdi Zhou, Pengzhang Liu, Qi Lv, Qianyun Wang, Qixia Jiang, Ruyue Li, Shimu Liang, Shuxing Wang, Sijie Zhang, Siqi Li, Tianhao Gao, Wang Ke, Weihu Huang, Wencan Lai, Wenjie Zhang, Xiaohui Zhang, Xiaojing Dong, Ya Liu, Yifeng Zhang, Yixiang Wang, Yongtai Zhang, Yongyi Liao, Zhaoru Chen, Zhen Chen, Zhiyong Ma, Zhiyuan Liu, Zhongwei Liu, Ziyan Xing. 2026-06-26. JD Oxygen AI Item Center (Oxygen AIIC) V1: An Industrial-Scale LLM/VLM-Centric Solution for Item Understanding, Management, and Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28070

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗