Incremental Dominating Set

Ilan Doron Arad; Jonathan Gal; Seffi Naor

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.27469

Incremental Dominating Set

Ilan Doron Arad·Jonathan Gal·Seffi Naor

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dominating Set is a fundamental problem in graph theory: given a graph, find a minimum-weight subset of vertices such that every vertex is either selected or adjacent to a selected vertex. In online settings where vertices arrive sequentially, comparing algorithms against an offline optimum with full knowledge of the input leads to extremely strong lower bounds, where even a simple star graph shows that any online algorithm must have competitive ratio $\Omega(\Delta)$, with $\Delta$ the largest degree of any vertex in the graph, matching the trivial strategy of selecting all vertices. We study the incremental dominating set problem, where the optimal algorithm is constrained to the same choices available to online algorithms. This introduces a benchmark that enables a meaningful comparison between algorithms. We present the first results for vertex-weighted graphs and randomized algorithms in this model. For incremental dominating set, we give an $O(\Delta)$-competitive deterministic algorithm and an $O(\log^2\Delta)$-competitive randomized algorithm. We extend these results to the Connected Dominating Set problem using a linear-programming formulation that captures connectivity through local constraints. When the neighborhood of each arriving vertex is known \textit{in advance}, deterministic algorithms achieve similar polylogarithmic competitive ratios as their randomized counterparts. Finally, we establish matching lower bounds, showing that our results are optimal up to constant factors.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Ilan Doron Arad, Jonathan Gal, Seffi Naor. 2026-06-25. Incremental Dominating Set. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27469

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗