arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.27175

Signed Total Roman Domination and Domatic Numbers: Degree Three and Complete Multipartite Graphs

Abstract

Signed total Roman domination is a variant of the classic Roman domination-problem in graphs. A signed total Roman dominating function (STRD function) on a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $f: V \to \{-1,1,2\}$ such that (i) $\sum_{u \in N(v)} f(u) \geq 1$ for all $v \in V$, where $N(v)$ denotes the neighborhood of $v$, and (ii) every vertex $v$ with $f(v) = -1$ is adjacent to a vertex $u$ with $f(u) = 2$. The weight of $f$ is $\sum_{v \in V} f(v)$. The signed total Roman domination number of $G$ is the minimum weight among all its STRD functions. A signed total Roman dominating family (STRD family) on $G$ is a family $\{f_1, \ldots, f_d\}$ of pairwise distinct STRD functions such that $\sum_{i=1}^{d} f_i(v) \leq 1$ for all $v \in V$. The signed total Roman domatic number of $G$ is the maximum size among all its STRD families. In this paper, we relate the signed total Roman domination number of a cubic graph to its open packing number, 2-tuple total domination number, and signed total domination number, allowing us to derive sharp bounds on the first invariant and to establish new $\mathcal{NP}$-completeness results for all four invariants. We demonstrate that having a degree-3 vertex determines a graph's signed total Roman domatic number. Combined with known results this implies that the associated decision problem is easy for graphs with maximum degree at most three and $\mathcal{NP}$-complete otherwise. To contrast these general hardness results, we determine signed total Roman domination and domatic numbers in complete multipartite graphs. Despite their simple structure, this is a non-trivial task.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arie M. C. A. Koster, Lutz Volkmann, Moritz Wehrmann. 2026-06-25. Signed Total Roman Domination and Domatic Numbers: Degree Three and Complete Multipartite Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO