arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.26265

NavIsaacLab: Generating Realistic Crowd via Parallel Robot Learning for Benchmarking Human-aware Navigation

Bingyi Xia·Han Bao·Jingyu Zhu·Hanjing Ye·Yuhan Pang·Guangcheng Chen·Liang Lin·Wenjun Xu·Jiankun Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Robot autonomous navigation that accounts for surrounding human activities is crucial for ensuring both safety and natural human-robot interaction in real-world environments shared by humans and robots. Simulation of complex and diverse navigation scenarios serves as the foundation for training reliable robot navigation policies and accurately evaluating the performance of algorithms, offering an efficient alternative to manual supervision of real data. However, current human-aware navigation research faces significant challenges due to the scarcity of diverse, high-quality scene data. Existing simulation platforms often rely on handcrafted rules to approximate pedestrian behavior and lack the capability to provide extensive sensor signals, typically assuming perfect observations. To address these limitations, this paper presents NavIsaacLab, a comprehensive framework for benchmarking and training human-aware navigation policies through physics-based and photo-realistic simulations of pedestrians and scenes. Based on Isaac Lab, the proposed framework employs photo-realistic scene rendering capabilities and supports parallel simulation on GPU, delivering real-time and accurate 3D visual feedback to robots. To enhance the realism of human behavior, a data-driven approach is employed that incorporates a trajectory diffusion model and an adversarial motion learning controller, enabling controllable, physics-based pedestrian simulation. Furthermore, the integration of diverse cross-scale scenes provides a robust benchmark for state-of-the-art human-aware navigation methods.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bingyi Xia, Han Bao, Jingyu Zhu, Hanjing Ye, Yuhan Pang, Guangcheng Chen, Liang Lin, Wenjun Xu, Jiankun Wang. 2026-06-24. NavIsaacLab: Generating Realistic Crowd via Parallel Robot Learning for Benchmarking Human-aware Navigation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26265

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗