arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.25950

Do (Not) Tell Me About My Insecurities: Assessing the Status Quo of Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure in Germany Amid New EU Cybersecurity Regulations

Sebastian Neef·Cenk Schlunke·Anne Hennig
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In our increasingly interconnected world, good IT security practices are necessary to prevent vulnerabilities and data breaches. Providing security contacts, e.g., via Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD) programs or security.txt files, is an important practice for businesses to facilitate vulnerability reporting by external parties. As part of a longitudinal study, we analyzed the adoption of, as well as the challenges and experiences with, CVD programs among the 40 companies listed on Germany's DAX (the country's primary stock market index). In addition to monitoring publicly available information about their CVD programs, we sent out questionnaires via email and postal mail in 2023 and 2025, and received answers from 20\% of the companies. The adoption rates show a significant increase from 50\% (2023) to over 90\% (2025), with ten new CVD programs and 25 new security.txt files now available. The survey answers reveal that, for example, legal obligations (e.g., NIS2 and CRA) drive the adoption of CVD practices, but a lack of (human) resources and varying report quality are considered drawbacks. As the first study to survey 40 German stock market index (DAX) companies on their CVD practices, our results can help foster the adoption and understanding of security programs among SMEs and other companies, and provide policymakers with insights into practical challenges and industry experiences.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sebastian Neef, Cenk Schlunke, Anne Hennig. 2026-06-24. Do (Not) Tell Me About My Insecurities: Assessing the Status Quo of Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure in Germany Amid New EU Cybersecurity Regulations. https://doi.org/10.1109/eurousec69254.2025.00020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗