arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.20680

Beyond ROC-AUC: Operating-Point Performance Reporting for Biometric Verification

Ajan Ahmed·Masudul H. Imtiaz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A biometric verifier is often deployed with a strict false match budget, so only a narrow, low false match rate (FMR) slice of the score range is used. A reporting standard for this setting already exists. ISO/IEC 19795-1 asks for error rates at stated operating points, for the detection error tradeoff (DET) curve as the view of the trade-off between FMR and the false non-match rate (FNMR), and for an interval of uncertainty on every value. In practice, a single area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), the equal error rate (EER), or a verification accuracy is still reported as the resolution, which is a threshold-independent summary that the standard does not endorse. The full ROC-AUC averages the true match rate (TMR) with equal weight over the whole FMR range from 0 to 1, so almost all of its weight is placed where the system is never operated; low-FMR behavior can then be hidden, and the order of two systems can even be reversed. The guideline is revisited in this paper and tested against seven pretrained matchers across four modalities, face, voice, iris, and fingerprint, each reported with bootstrap confidence intervals and paired bootstrap tests. A system that looks stronger on full ROC-AUC is shown to be significantly worse at FMR = 10^-3. For face, a higher full AUC was obtained by FaceNet, whereas a higher TMR at FMR = 10^-3 was obtained by ArcFace, and both gaps were significant with non-overlapping intervals. Hence, the DET curve and the FNMR at a fixed FMR are re-iterated in this paper as the primary report, with ROC-AUC and EER retained as supplementary context.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVeess.AS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ajan Ahmed, Masudul H. Imtiaz. 2026-06-13. Beyond ROC-AUC: Operating-Point Performance Reporting for Biometric Verification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SAMReg: SAM-enabled Image Registration with ROI-based Correspondence

This paper describes a new spatial correspondence representation based on paired regions-of-interest (ROIs), for medical image registration. The distinct properties of the proposed ROI-based correspondence are discussed, in the context of potential benefits in clinical applications following image registration, compared with alternative correspondence-representing approaches, such as those based on sampled displacements and spatial transformation functions. These benefits include a clear connection between learning-based image registration and segmentation, which in turn motivates two cases of image registration approaches using (pre-)trained segmentation networks. Based on the segment anything model (SAM), a vision foundation model for segmentation, we develop a new registration algorithm SAMReg, which does not require any training (or training data), gradient-based fine-tuning or prompt engineering. The proposed SAMReg models are evaluated across five real-world applications, including intra-subject registration tasks with cardiac MR and lung CT, challenging inter-subject registration scenarios with prostate MR and retinal imaging, and an additional evaluation with a non-clinical example with aerial image registration. The proposed methods outperform both intensity-based iterative algorithms and DDF-predicting learning-based networks across tested metrics including Dice and target registration errors on anatomical structures, and further demonstrates competitive performance compared to weakly-supervised registration approaches that rely on fully-segmented training data. Open source code and examples are available at: https://github.com/sqhuang0103/SAMReg.git.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Q-SiT: Teaching LMMs for Image Quality Scoring and Interpreting

Image quality scoring and interpreting are two fundamental components of Image Quality Assessment (IQA). The former quantifies image quality, while the latter enables descriptive question answering about image quality. Traditionally, these two tasks have been addressed independently. However, image-quality-specific psychophysical studies suggest that these two tasks are conceptually interconnected: interpreting explicitly represents perceived quality attributes whereas scoring summarizes such evidence into an overall quality judgment. Thus, unifying these capabilities within a single model is both intuitive and logically coherent. In this paper, we propose Q-SiT (Quality Scoring and Interpreting joint Teaching), a unified framework that enables large multimodal models (LMMs) to learn both image quality scoring and interpreting simultaneously. We achieve this by transforming conventional IQA datasets into learnable question-answering datasets and incorporating human-annotated quality interpreting data for training. Furthermore, we introduce an efficient scoring \& interpreting balance strategy, which first determines the optimal data mix ratio on lightweight LMMs and then maps this ratio to primary LMMs for fine-tuning adjustment. This strategy not only mitigates task interference and enhances cross-task knowledge transfer but also significantly reduces computational costs compared to direct optimization on full-scale LMMs. With this joint learning framework and corresponding training strategy, we develop Q-SiT, the first model capable of simultaneously performing image quality scoring and interpreting tasks, along with its lightweight variant, Q-SiT-mini. Experimental results demonstrate that Q-SiT achieves strong performance in both tasks with superior generalization IQA abilities, while Q-SiT-mini significantly reduces computational overhead while maintaining competitive performance.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Preserving Guidance in Cost-Volume Retrieval under Extreme LiDAR Sparsity in Iterative Stereo

While accurate LiDAR depth has been shown to improve stereo matching, high-end LiDAR remains costly and difficult to deploy at scale, motivating guidance from sparse LiDAR measurements. In this paper, we revisit how extremely sparse LiDAR can guide iterative stereo by examining its cost-volume retrieval mechanism. Our analysis shows that LiDAR guidance degrades sharply when only a few hundred points are available, and we provide a signal-processing explanation for why iterative stereo fails to fully exploit such sparse input. This insight leads to a simple yet highly effective remedy: pre-filling the initial disparity map so that cost-volume retrieval becomes more reliable under extremely sparse LiDAR. We find that pre-filling is also effective when injecting LiDAR depth into image features via early fusion, but for a fundamentally different reason, necessitating a distinct pre-filling approach. Combining both forms of guidance, our proposed Guided RAFT-Stereo (GRAFT-Stereo) achieves substantial improvements over existing LiDAR-guided stereo methods across multiple datasets.

cs.CV↗