arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.20597

From Punishment to Protection: Charting Six Decades of U.S. Juvenile Justice Through Topic Modeling and LLM-Assisted Analysis

Nia E. George·Simeon Sayer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Juvenile courts handle two very different kinds of cases: young people accused of crimes, and children at risk in their own families, and both streams have been changing dramatically over the past fifty years. This paper asks: what has shifted, and can computational methods track that change at scale? Topic modeling and LLM-assisted trend analysis is applied to 60,470 U.S. appellate opinions spanning 1970 to 2025, identifying 182 distinct legal topics organized into 10 themes covering the full range of juvenile justice litigation. The results are striking. Child welfare litigation tripled its share of the corpus. Sex offender registration cases more than doubled. Traditional punitive mechanisms, judicial transfer to adult court and the juvenile death penalty, declined sharply. A new cluster of sentencing cases emerged after 2010, reflecting landmark Supreme Court rulings that fundamentally redrew the constitutional limits on juvenile punishment. Analysis also shows that legal vocabulary shifts decade by decade: the language courts used in the 1970s can be unrecognisable by the 2020s, even for the same underlying legal question. The fastest-growing area of the corpus has fractured into dozens of jurisdiction-specific variants that no single topic can capture. In both cases, case counts alone would miss the full arc of doctrinal change. This paper demonstrates that large-scale, reproducible analysis of appellate case law, quantitative trends and doctrinal arcs alike, is possible and practically useful. It also reveals critical risks that any AI-based decision support tool used in juvenile justice and trained on such corpus will encounter: temporal mismatch, vocabulary drift, jurisdictional fragmentation, and the divergence of delinquency and child welfare into two parallel legal systems. Addressing these risks must be a fundamental requirement for any tool used in this domain.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nia E. George, Simeon Sayer. 2026-05-18. From Punishment to Protection: Charting Six Decades of U.S. Juvenile Justice Through Topic Modeling and LLM-Assisted Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20597

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Brief AI Literacy Intervention Does Not Significantly Reduce Over-Reliance and Increases Under-Reliance on ChatGPT: A Randomized Study

In this study, we examined whether a brief AI literacy intervention influences high school students' reliance on recommendations from large language models (LLMs). In a randomized experiment, students were assigned to either a control group receiving a brief introduction to LLMs or an intervention group receiving additional information about how LLMs work, their limitations, and effective usage strategies. Participants then solved eight math puzzles with ChatGPT's advice, which was incorrect in half of the trials. Results indicated widespread over-reliance, with incorrect recommendations adopted in 52.1% of the trials. The intervention did not significantly reduce over-reliance. Instead, it led to an increase in under-reliance, as students were more likely to reject correct recommendations. These findings provide preliminary evidence that brief text-based interventions may be ineffective in fostering appropriate reliance. More comprehensive and interactive approaches may be required to meaningfully influence students' real-world reliance on LLMs.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Your Programming Students' Cognition with ChatGPT: Higher Performance, Lower Retention, and Reduced Ownership

Generative AI can improve students' programming performance, but successful task completion may not reflect what they retain. We examined performance, retention, cognitive load, and ownership in a controlled between-subjects experiment with 59 undergraduate computer science students, 55 were retained for analysis. Participants completed three introductory C programming tasks with access to ChatGPT-4.5 or conventional web search without generative AI. We measured task performance, self-reported mental effort and difficulty, pupillary responses, heart rate variability, and ownership, and assessed cued recall immediately and 48 hours later. ChatGPT-assisted students achieved higher coding scores (89% vs. 69%) but lower recall scores immediately (41% vs. 53%) and after 48 hours (39% vs. 52%). There was no significant difference in the loss of recall information over 48 hours between the groups. Self-reported mental effort increased less across tasks in the ChatGPT condition (Holm-adjusted p = .047), and students attributed less of the submitted code to themselves (45% vs. 81%). Confirmatory physiological tests did not detect significant differences in trajectories between conditions; substantial data loss limits their interpretation. These findings reveal a gap between assisted task performance and subsequent recall and sense of ownership in this setting. They motivate the need for assessment practices and AI learning tools that require students to explain, retrieve, and contribute to the work they submit as active participants in their education.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Open Platform Field Experiments: Expanding the Design Space of Experimental Research on Social Media

Despite a growing demand for causal evidence about social media, independent researchers remain severely constrained in their ability to conduct experiments directly on online platforms. To cope, multiple methodological workarounds have emerged - from controlled surveys and simulations to client-side overlays and platform partnerships - each requiring distinct trade-offs between desirable experimental properties. The recent emergence of open social media platforms offers a qualitatively different methodological opportunity. Here we propose a design space of social media experimentation and discuss Open Platform Field Experiments (OPFEs). OPFEs represent a distinct class of experimental approaches that enable independent researchers to directly intervene on functional platform components - such as clients, recommendation systems, and moderation services - within live social media environments. Through a comparative analysis of experimental archetypes, we show that OPFEs occupy a previously unexplored region of the design space. We then bridge theory and practice by characterizing the architectural and governance elements that enable OPFEs, mapping them onto Bluesky and the AT Protocol, and illustrating the end-to-end lifecycle of a complete OPFE design. Overall, this work establishes OPFEs as a practical methodological paradigm for independent, transparent, and ecologically grounded experimentation on open social media.

cs.CY↗