arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.19833

Fault-Tolerant Shared-Relay Communication in Circulant Interconnection Networks

Bader Albader·Galal Hassan·Mohamed R. Al-Mulla
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Circulant interconnection networks provide symmetric addressing, compact generator descriptions, and uniform local connectivity. This paper maps a degree--redundancy landscape for a fault-tolerant two-hop primitive in directed circulants: given $n$ nodes and degree budget $m$, how large can the worst-case shared-relay multiplicity $R(n,m)$ be? A node is a shared relay for an ordered terminal pair if it has outgoing links to both terminals; an $f$-relay-fault-tolerant circulant requires at least $f+1$ such relays for every pair. The underlying feasibility condition is a cyclic difference-multiplicity condition, which we use as a mathematical tool rather than claim as a new object. The contribution is the network-design framework around this tool: the parameters $R(n,m)$ and $D_f(n)$, a negative theorem for interval circulants, relay-table preprocessing and lookup algorithms, adversarial and random failure guarantees, load-balance scope, certified upper-bound interpretation of heuristic designs, exact small-$n$ calibration, a software lookup-versus-search microbenchmark, and a reproducible study of 526,539 generator sets. The results show that generator choice critically determines worst-case relay survivability: optimized threshold designs achieve $f$-relay-fault tolerance within about $1.16$--$1.63$ of the counting lower bound, while standard interval generators can fail structurally even at much larger degrees.

Explore related subjects

cs.DCcs.ITcs.NImath.IT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bader Albader, Galal Hassan, Mohamed R. Al-Mulla. 2026-06-18. Fault-Tolerant Shared-Relay Communication in Circulant Interconnection Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19833

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Concertina: Data-Centric Adaptive Pipeline Parallelism for Efficient Heterogeneous Long-Context LLM Training

Long context training is crucial for extending LLM context windows. Existing schemes, such as sequence parallelism, incur substantial communication overhead. Pipeline parallelism (PP) reduces this cost, but its effectiveness hinges on partitioning granularity. Batch-level PP employing sequence packing exhibits high memory consumption in long-context scenarios, whereas token-level PP splitting sequences into slices alleviates memory overhead but may introduce performance degradation. Moreover, the skewed sequence-length distribution in real-world datasets defeats any monolithic, static choice of PP granularity. In this paper, we propose \textit{Dynamic Pipeline Parallelism} (DPP), which transforms PP granularity from a static design choice into a workload-adaptive optimization space over packed, split, and hybrid chunks. DPP further introduces a new coupling between heterogeneous pipeline scheduling and gradient checkpointing. To solve this coupling, \name co-optimizes dynamic chunk scheduling with \textit{Stage-Aware Chunk-Level Adaptive Checkpointing}. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that \name achieves up to 1.69\texttimes\ speedup over FlexSP and up to 1.40\texttimes\ over MEPipe. The source code is available at https://github.com/wsjdsg/InfiniPipe-code.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

A Low-Latency Semantic State Estimator using Latent Predictive Learning for Dynamic Network Monitoring and Orchestration

Closed-loop network monitoring and orchestration increasingly require semantic interpretations of live telemetry beyond raw counter collection. However, dynamic cloud-edge environments change both the active node set and the monitoring query at runtime, while control loops demand bounded millisecond-scale responses. We introduce a latent predictive state estimator (LPSE) for dynamic network monitoring and orchestration, built on latent predictive learning over streaming telemetry. The framework converts variable-cardinality node telemetry into topology-adaptive temporal representations, fuses them with monitoring questions, and returns bounded answers from a semantic codebook instead of autoregressive text generation. This design enables fixed-cost, single-pass inference while preserving semantic interpretability. By operating on permutation-invariant, slot-routed node representations keyed by stable identity, the model maintains a fixed input space and generalizes to node addition, removal, and reordering without retraining. Experimental results on a multi-node Kubernetes cluster show semantic prediction accuracy of 87.13% at approximately 72x lower mean inference latency compared to the lowest latency LLM tested.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

X-Stage: Modeling Post-Issue Backpressure in GPU Communication--Computation Fusion

Fine-grained, device-initiated communication allows fused GPU kernels to issue remote stores directly from their compute pipelines, a pattern increasingly used in expert parallelism (EP), tensor parallelism (TP), and Ulysses-style sequence parallelism (UP). Existing designs reason about where communication is issued and when remote data becomes ready, but lack a quantitative model of the sender-side interval after a remote store is accepted and before it becomes visible at the destination. This interval determines whether communication remains decoupled from computation or backpressures it. We identify X-Stage, a software-visible post-issue stage with finite decoupling. Downstream pressure can dissipate while the issuer resumes useful work, whereas sustained injection consumes X-Stage headroom and eventually stalls the compute pipeline. We characterize this behavior and build a calibrated model that predicts whether remote-store arrivals accumulate backpressure or recover during intervening computation. Guided by the model, we reshape bursty arrivals when they would exhaust X-Stage headroom and exploit natural compute windows when headroom can recover concurrently. Evaluation across representative EP, TP, and UP workloads shows up to 1.62x fused-kernel, 1.75x end-to-end, and 1.43x sender-visible speedup, respectively. Microbenchmarks further validate the model's predictions of backlog accumulation, recovery, and sender-side backpressure.

cs.DC↗