Mean-Payoff-Parity and Lifting Strategies from MDPs to 2-Player Stochastic Games

Mohan Dantam; Richard Mayr

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.19324

Mean-Payoff-Parity and Lifting Strategies from MDPs to 2-Player Stochastic Games

Mohan Dantam·Richard Mayr

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the strategy complexity (i.e., memory and randomization) of optimal strategies in turn-based 2-player zero-sum stochastic games. Results in [Gimbert,Kelmendi:2023] show how to lift optimal memoryless strategies for shift-invariant inverse-submixing objectives from MDPs to 2-player stochastic games with an exponential increase in the number of memory modes. We show the corresponding lower bound, i.e., the extra exponential memory is required in general, even for randomized strategies. Moreover, we solve the strategy complexity of the well-studied mean-payoff-parity objective in 2-player stochastic games. This objective is also shift-invariant inverse-submixing, but easier than the worst case for this class. In MDPs, Maximizer has optimal memoryless randomized strategies, while optimal deterministic strategies require exponential memory. However, in stochastic games, optimal randomized strategies require, at least and at most, linear memory (equal to the number of even colors). Finally, we show that a different construction for lifting memoryless (resp. finite-memory) deterministic strategies from MDPs (resp. 1-player games) to 2-player games cannot be generalized even to memoryless randomized strategies. We construct a shift-invariant objective where Max and Min each have optimal memoryless randomized strategies in all MDPs, but optimal (randomized) Max strategies still require infinite memory in deterministic 2-player games.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Mohan Dantam, Richard Mayr. 2026-06-17. Mean-Payoff-Parity and Lifting Strategies from MDPs to 2-Player Stochastic Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19324

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗