arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.18533

On the notion of a patterning property in model theory

Abstract

Different kinds of definable patterns in the models of a first-order theory, such as the order property, the tree property, or the ($n$-)strict order property, allow us to distinguish theories according to their logical complexity. The complexity distinctions given by these definable patterns play a central role in model theory. However, a rigorous definition of the notion of a model-theoretic patterning property has yet to be established. We start by discussing different proposals from the literature for making the notion of a model-theoretic patterning property rigorous. Some examples will include the straight definability of Shelah, which will describe properties definable by a pattern of consistency and inconsistency in a formula and its negation, and the poset definability of Garcia and Mennuni, covering properties definable by interpreting a partial order embedding a given poset. We will also introduce a higher-arity version of straight definability. In our first main result, we will answer open questions of Bailetti and Garcia-Mennuni, showing that the $n$-strict order property $\mathrm{SOP}_{n}$ is straightly definable and poset definable even for integers $n \geq 4$. This will complete the categorization of all of the classical classification-theoretic properties as straightly definable. Our other main result will concern properties that are straightly definable without negation: the positively straightly definable properties defined by Bailetti. We will show using Saracino's theorem and results of Bodirsky, Bodor and Marimon that, in any countably categorical theory, implications between positively straightly definable properties must be exhibited at the level of $\exists\forall$-formulas. This will have special consequences under the assumption that $\mathrm{SOP}_{2}$ is equal to $\mathrm{SOP}_{3}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gabriel Day, Scott Mutchnik. 2026-06-16. On the notion of a patterning property in model theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18533

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO