arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.14787

Vision-Encoder Behavioral Fingerprints of Image-to-Image Generative Models: A Training-Paradigm-Driven Taxonomy of Six Commercial APIs

Hunter Hill
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study six production image-to-image AI systems (gpt-image-1, Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, Flux Kontext, SDXL img2img, SD3 img2img, and Qwen Image Edit) under a content-adaptive sub-JND adversarial perturbation pipeline, scoring all outputs by frozen DINOv2 ViT-B/14 token distances against clean references. Across a 3,588-call corpus spanning COCO photographs, CelebA-HQ portraits, and AI-generated inputs, the six systems partition into two image-invariant behavioral bands on a 2D (patch_mean, ssim_clean) plane: edit-trained models (Flux Kontext, Qwen Edit, Gemini) cluster in a tight band, while T2I-base models adapted at sampling time (SDXL, SD3, gpt-image-1) cluster in a drift band.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVcs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hunter Hill. 2026-09-07. Vision-Encoder Behavioral Fingerprints of Image-to-Image Generative Models: A Training-Paradigm-Driven Taxonomy of Six Commercial APIs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14787

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CR subjectcs.CV subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Vision Token Manipulation Attacks on Cloud-Edge Inference of Large Vision-Language Models

Cloud-edge Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM) inference enables efficient deployment by splitting computation between edge devices and cloud servers. In this process, intermediate vision tokens are transmitted from the edge to the cloud over a communication link, thereby exposing a new attack surface. We study vision token manipulation attack (VTM-Attack) under a black-box man-in-the-middle setting, where an adversary intercepts and manipulates a subset of transmitted vision tokens under a budget constraint. We propose four naïve attack strategies and an optimization-based token selection method. Experiments on 6 state-of-the-art LVLMs (3B-72B) across 4 benchmarks show that manipulating only 10\% of vision tokens can reduce accuracy by up to 88.31\%. These results reveal a critical vulnerability in cloud-edge LVLM inference.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

A Survey on Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Diffusion Models Across Multiple Modalities

Diffusion models have become the dominant family of generative models in the visual domain. However, their widespread public availability enables misuse at scale, motivating a rapidly growing body of research on adversarial attacks and defenses. This survey provides, to our knowledge, the first unified review of this literature across three visual modalities: image, video, and 3D. We introduce a comprehensive, task-centric taxonomy: we first divide the literature by modality; within each modality, we separate methods into attacks and defenses, and then group them by the generative task they target, presenting them chronologically within each task. Moreover, we provide an in-depth analysis of their evaluation settings, consolidating the datasets, metrics, and benchmarks used to assess them. We conclude by identifying several open challenges and outlining concrete future research directions. Project Webpage: https://github.com/ozgurkara99/awesome-adv-attack-defense-on-diffusion

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

SpatialTrust: A Benchmark for Environmental Risk Recognition in Secure Authentication

Visual environmental risk recognition plays an important role in secure authentication, where a user's surroundings may reveal sensitive information or introduce potential security risks. However, existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) rarely examine whether models can reliably recognize, localize, and explain such risks in spatially grounded authentication scenarios. We present SpatialTrust, a question-answering benchmark for evaluating environmental risk recognition in secure authentication. SpatialTrust assesses five complementary abilities: sensitive factor detection, direct factor identification, indirect factor identification, direct factor explanation, and indirect factor explanation. We evaluate both proprietary and open-source MLLMs and find that current models show limited performance, especially in understanding and explaining indirect risks, indicating that spatial risk awareness remains a challenging capability for MLLMs. In addition, we introduce SpatialTrustGuard, a structured QA-and-audit pipeline that improves Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct from 36.78% to 41.12% overall. Our findings highlight the need for dedicated benchmarks and structured inference methods to improve the trustworthiness of MLLMs in secure authentication.

cs.CR↗