Bayesian Effect Selection for Additive Quantile Regression with an Application to Air Pollution Thresholds

Nadja Klein; Aaron Wei Qi Lee; Jorge Mateu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.12164

Bayesian Effect Selection for Additive Quantile Regression with an Application to Air Pollution Thresholds

Nadja Klein·Aaron Wei Qi Lee·Jorge Mateu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Air pollution regulatory limits are typically defined in terms of exceedances of concentration thresholds which are naturally related to conditional quantiles of the pollutant distribution and are therefore of direct relevance for assessing severe pollution events. At the same time, it is important to determine not only whether a covariate affects air pollution but also whether this effect is linear, nonlinear, or both. We address these issues by developing a Bayesian effect selection approach for additive quantile regression. While commonly used mixed model representations (MMRs) of penalized splines allow for flexible nonlinear effects, they do not provide a meaningful separation of linear and nonlinear effect components. We therefore employ a Demmler-Reinsch basis expansion, which yields an orthogonal decomposition of each additive effect into linear and nonlinear parts and show theoretically that both effect components can be estimated consistently. To facilitate data-driven model building, we propose Bayesian effect selection with separate spike and slab priors on the scalar importance parameters associated with the linear and nonlinear components and implement an efficient Gibbs sampler. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate robustness to the misspecification induced by the employed asymmetric Laplace working likelihood and show superior performance relative to the MMR. In a detailed analysis of air pollution data in Madrid, Spain we highlight the added value of flexibly modeling extreme nitrogen dioxide (NO$_2$) concentrations and reveal that threshold-relevant pollution levels are driven differently by climatological variables and traffic-related spatial structure. These findings underline the need for advanced statistical models that support short-term decision-making and help local authorities mitigate, or potentially prevent, exceedances of NO$_2$ concentration limits.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Nadja Klein, Aaron Wei Qi Lee, Jorge Mateu. 2026-06-10. Bayesian Effect Selection for Additive Quantile Regression with an Application to Air Pollution Thresholds. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12164

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗