arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.12005

Game-Theoretic Latent Space Alignment for Multi-user Semantic MIMO Communications

Abstract

Semantic communications enable AI-native wireless systems by mapping raw data into compressed task-oriented latent representations. However, independently trained agents often rely on heterogeneous latent spaces and background knowledge, leading to semantic mismatch that degrades mutual understanding and downstream task execution, especially in interferencelimited multi-user wireless networks. This paper investigates distributed latent-space alignment in multi-user semantic MIMO interference networks with cognitive radio constraints. We consider primary users and semantic-aware secondary users sharing the same wireless resources, where secondary agents must simultaneously mitigate interference and align heterogeneous semantic representations. To address this problem, we formulate semantic alignment as a non-cooperative game and derive a closed-form solution for the joint optimization of linear semantic MIMO transceivers under power and interference constraints. Exploiting the structure of the problem, we recast the original matrix valued optimization into a lower-dimensional power-allocation game, leading to an iterative semantic water-filling algorithm. We establish sufficient conditions for existence, uniqueness, and global convergence to a Nash equilibrium, explicitly relating semantic alignment properties and physical-channel interactions. Numerical results assess the performance of the proposed framework, revealing key trade-offs among semantic compression, task performance, and hierarchical spectrum access.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Giuseppe Di Poce, Mattia Merluzzi, Emilio Calvanese Strinati, Paolo Di Lorenzo. 2026-06-10. Game-Theoretic Latent Space Alignment for Multi-user Semantic MIMO Communications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT