arXiv · 2606.11666
The Hidden Cost of Pairwise Verification in Synthetic Speech Source Tracing
Abstract
Open-set source tracing is increasingly framed as a verification problem, motivating the use of pairwise metric-learning objectives from biometrics. We thus compare global anchoring and pairwise verification under matched backbones and a fixed data and epoch budget on MLAAD (in-domain) and STOPA (out-of-domain). In our runs, global anchoring yields lower in-domain error (8.61% EER) than pairwise variants (12-15% EER), even with rival mining and XLS-R finetuning. Because pairwise objectives optimize similarity directly, they concentrate variance into fewer embedding directions, reducing resolution among closely related generators. To test if this drives the drop, we impose a similar bottleneck to the globally supervised baseline, yet the baseline remains competitive. Together with an embedding-space analysis ($k_{99}$), these results suggest that the gap is not explained by dimensionality alone, but rather by the pairwise objective's shaping of the retained directions.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Anton Firc, Zbyněk Lička, Vojtěch Staněk, Kamil Malinka. 2026-06-10. The Hidden Cost of Pairwise Verification in Synthetic Speech Source Tracing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11666
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.