Arbitrage-free Data Pricing

Yihang Wu; Zhengyu Jin; Yicheng Fu; Jinfei Liu; Kui Ren

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.10451

Arbitrage-free Data Pricing

Yihang Wu·Zhengyu Jin·Yicheng Fu·Jinfei Liu·Kui Ren

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study optimal pricing of versioned data products when buyers can combine multiple purchases. A monopoly seller offers a menu of data products, and a buyer's value for data is the improvement to their expected utility in a Bayesian decision problem. Since a buyer may purchase any finite bundle of products, including repeated copies of the same product, versioning creates arbitrage opportunities: a bundle of cheaper products may be more valuable than a product with a higher price. We formulate the arbitrage-free data selling problem which has infinite arbitrage-free constraints in general and possibly infinite state space, and prove its computational intractability: the problem admits no PTAS even for instances in which the state space is finite, and the problem admits no polynomial time constant factor approximation for succinct high-dimensional instances. On the positive side, when the numbers of buyer types and actions are constant, we give an additive FPTAS that handles possibly infinite state spaces and infinitely many arbitrage-free constraints, and empirically validate the algorithm on realistic synthetic data trading scenarios. We also analyze the posted pricing algorithm for selling only complete information and prove a tight approximation factor. We further identify a threshold utility regime in which arbitrage-freeness reduces to Blackwell dominance, which unifies known arbitrage-free conditions for dataset query and machine learning model pricing. Under this regime, we design efficient algorithms for several structured data menus common in practice.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Yihang Wu, Zhengyu Jin, Yicheng Fu, Jinfei Liu, Kui Ren. 2026-06-09. Arbitrage-free Data Pricing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗