Welfare Maximization in Bilateral Trade: Improved Approximation Guarantees Beyond the Fixed Price Barrier

Shahar Dobzinski; Ariel Shaulker

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.04890

Welfare Maximization in Bilateral Trade: Improved Approximation Guarantees Beyond the Fixed Price Barrier

Shahar Dobzinski·Ariel Shaulker

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the setting of welfare maximization in bilateral trade, where the values of both the buyer and the seller are drawn from independent distributions. Our goal is to maximize social welfare. In this setting, fixed price mechanisms have been extensively studied. In a fixed price mechanism, there is a price $p$ that depends only on the distributions of the buyer and the seller. Trade occurs if and only if the buyer's value is at least $p$ and the seller's value is at most $p$. A long line of work has culminated in determining almost exactly the approximation ratios achievable by fixed price mechanisms: there exists a fixed price mechanism that obtains at least a $0.72$ fraction of the social welfare, but no fixed price mechanism can guarantee more than a $0.7381$ fraction of it [Cai and Wu, STOC'23; Liu, Ren, and Wang, STOC'23]. No other incentive-compatible mechanism is known to beat the performance of fixed-price mechanisms in this setting. This paper shows how to achieve a larger fraction of the optimal welfare with other classes of mechanisms. Specifically, we study the buyer-offering mechanism with a reserve price. In this mechanism, the buyer observes its value and makes a take-it-or-leave-it offer to the seller, where the offer is at least the reserve price. Beyond its simplicity, this natural mechanism is attractive because the seller always has a dominant strategy: accept the offer if its value is at most the offer, and otherwise reject it. We show that there always exists a reserve price that guarantees a $0.746$ fraction of the social welfare. This not only improves upon the best previously known approximation guarantee for the problem, but also demonstrates that fixed-price mechanisms are not optimal in this setting.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Shahar Dobzinski, Ariel Shaulker. 2026-06-03. Welfare Maximization in Bilateral Trade: Improved Approximation Guarantees Beyond the Fixed Price Barrier. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04890

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗