arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.04534

MAD: Mapping-Aware World Models for Agile Quadrotor Flight

Abstract

Agile quadrotor flight in cluttered scenes requires more than a reactive mapping from a depth image to a control command: the vehicle must remember which regions have been observed, infer nearby occupied space, and act under partial visibility and tight latency. In this paper, we present Mapping-Aware Dreamer (MAD), a geometry-aware world model for vision-based quadrotor flight. Instead of using raw-image reconstruction as the main self-supervised objective, MAD learns recurrent latent dynamics that reconstruct robocentric occupancy and visibility grid maps together with proprioceptive states. This design forces the latent state to encode local geometry, visibility history, and ego-motion in a form that is directly relevant to collision avoidance. MAD is trained in DiffAero using a GPU-parallel map-construction module that provides high-throughput supervision for occupancy and visibility. The learned representation is used in three policy-learning modes: imagination-based MAD-Dreamer and feature-extractor variants based on PPO and SHAC. Across visual navigation and racing tasks, MAD-based agents achieve higher success rates, faster flight, and better cross-task transfer than corresponding vision-only baselines. The model also produces interpretable map predictions and accurate ego-motion estimates from depth observations. We further deploy the learned policy on a physical quadrotor with an Intel RealSense D435i and demonstrate safe indoor and outdoor flight under limited sensing, reaching 9.66 m/s in simulation and 5.05 m/s in real-world forest experiments. These results show that mapping-aware world models provide a practical middle ground between modular aerial navigation and end-to-end learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xinhong Zhang, Runqing Wang, Yunfan Ren, Ding Yu, Boyu Zhou, Jian Sun, Fang Deng, Jie Chen, Gang Wang. 2026-06-03. MAD: Mapping-Aware World Models for Agile Quadrotor Flight. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04534

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO