arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.03429

Modeling Discrete Data with High-Order Vector Potts Models

Abstract

Modeling high-dimensional data is challenging, yet essential to understanding many complex systems. Maximum entropy models such as Ising and Potts models have been used extensively to capture pairwise interactions from correlation patterns in data, allowing to infer graphical representations of complex systems from observations (e.g., from protein sequences or neural population activity). Recently, there has been growing interest in modeling higher-order correlation patterns involving simultaneously three or more variables. While progress has been made in binary data with high-order Ising models, we extend this framework to the more general case of discrete data. We introduce q-state spin models, a complete family of maximum entropy models that generalize the vector Potts model to include long-range and arbitrary high-order interactions. In the pairwise case, our models allow for more diverse interaction types compared to the standard vector Potts model. We discuss their statistical interpretation with examples and relate them to discrete Fourier analysis. Using a loop expansion of the partition function, we show that the statistical properties of spin models are fully captured by the algebraic structure of their interactions. We define gauge transformations under which this structure, and thus the partition function, remains invariant. Models equivalent under gauge transformations can be seen as different representations of the same abstract statistical model, despite generally having interactions of different orders, extending results from the binary case. For practical application to data analysis, we focus on a subset of models known in the binary case as Minimally Complex Models, generalizing them to discrete data. We obtain a closed-form expression for the marginal likelihood of these models, enabling fast model selection. We illustrate their use with simple real-world examples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aaron De Clercq, Merijn Moody, Clélia de Mulatier. 2026-06-02. Modeling Discrete Data with High-Order Vector Potts Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03429

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME