arXiv · 2606.03348
SynCred-Bench: Benchmarking Synthetic Credibility in AI-Generated Visual Misinformation
Abstract
Recent generative models can now produce visual artifacts with realistic embedded text and layouts, creating a new misinformation threat: synthetic credibility. We introduce SYNCRED-Bench, a benchmark of 600 AI-generated misinformation images balanced across six credible-form categories and seven fine-grained circulation styles, together with FP450, a real-image negative set for measuring false positives. Extensive evaluation shows that existing systems remain unreliable: under a 5% false-positive-rate constraint, 15 MLLMs achieve only 10.5% true positive rate (TPR), open-source AIGC detectors achieve less than 5%, and commercial APIs reach 57.6%. Human annotators also struggled to identify synthetic credibility, reaching only 63% TPR. These findings establish synthetic credibility as a severe and underexplored visual misinformation challenge, and provide a benchmark for developing detectors that reason beyond superficial credibility cues.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Junxiao Yang, Minghao Zhang, Xiaoce Wang, Haoran Liu, Shiyao Cui, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang. 2026-06-02. SynCred-Bench: Benchmarking Synthetic Credibility in AI-Generated Visual Misinformation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03348
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.