arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.02898

Canonical reconstruction and forcing absoluteness of standard structures

Abstract

We isolate a simple preservation principle governing when it is absolute, between transitive models of set theory, that a given algebraic or topological-algebraic structure has a standard form $F(X)$ indexed by a set $X$. The principle is: if the index $X$ (or a proxy for it) can be recovered from $F(X)$ by a uniform definable construction, then the class of structures isomorphic to some~$F(X)$ is downward absolute from forcing extensions. Answering a question raised by Noah Schweber, we deduce in particular that no group that fails to be a full symmetric group in the ground model can become one after forcing; the result holds already in ZF. The same mechanism applies to full transformation monoids, powerset Boolean algebras, full relation algebras, full clones, full partition lattices, products $R^X$ of finitely generated centrally indecomposable rings, the commutative $C^*$-algebras $\ell_\infty(X)$ and $c_0(X)$, full endomorphism rings, the operator algebras $\mathcal{B}(H)$ and $\mathcal{K}(H)$, and $\ell_1(X)$ as a real Banach lattice. In the motivating symmetric-group case, the same reconstruction gives more than descent: it yields a uniform $\Pi^1_1$ definition of fullness over transitive ZF-models. We then exhibit clean torsor obstructions, in the standard symmetric-model situation: finite covers $Y \times n$ already separate ZF-failure from ZFC-descent without any completeness caveat, and the finite-support normed space $c_{00}(I)$ provides the analogous Banach example. Bare-Banach-space isomorphism with $\ell_1(\Gamma)$ exhibits a genuine ZFC-descent. We conclude with the corresponding, relative, obstructions to $\Pi^1_1$-definability of standardness over transitive ZF-models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tomasz Kania. 2026-06-01. Canonical reconstruction and forcing absoluteness of standard structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02898

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO