arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.02854

Fixed-Point Scaffolding in the Clef Programming Language

Abstract

For fans of Gabriel's "Worse is Better" it may be ironic that C++, by way of MLIR, serves as the scaffold for compiling an ML-family language whose correctness properties are structural. A crucial intersection in our Composer compiler initiates its lowering with a fixed-point combinator that preserves the dimensional, grade, escape, and numeric-representation structure from the Program Semantic Graph. And the MLIR that's witnessed from the PSG is no passive host. Its use of static single assignment, attribute system and dialects carry that structure materially. We show that our compiler middle end uses categorical construction for lowering code with companion verification to that strata: a functor from the compilation poset to a target category, subject to the compositionality equation. The grounding of our approach comes from three sources, each on its own algebraic object: Ohori's machine-code proof theory grounds the compilation axis, parametricity grounds the content at the base, and adjoint mode logic grounds the traversal between our verification tiers. To extend the thesis we introduce compact-closed negative and fractional types, and show the type machinery can be carried with preserved structure and realized through tooling MLIR provides. More broadly, the same fixed-point primitive that preserves types through compilation also supplies proof terms that can continue to be exercised in MLIR to verify its integrity as lowering proceeds through the pipeline. We argue that this foundation is a unique additional point anticipated by our framework that includes dimensional types, Tarau's groupoid, and cellular sheaves. Throughout, the formalism is instrumented as an internal scaffold: the abstractions support the compiler's mechanics, where a developer is never required to reach for category theory in order to rely on the guarantees the compiler provides.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Houston Haynes. 2026-06-01. Fixed-Point Scaffolding in the Clef Programming Language. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02854

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

UnsafeChecker: Finding Soundness Bugs in Rust Safe Abstractions

Rust guarantees memory safety without garbage collection through a strict ownership and borrowing system. However, for low-level systems programming, many widely used libraries rely on the unsafe keyword. These libraries encapsulate raw-pointer operations behind safe APIs to form safe abstractions. A single mistake in this internal unsafe code can break its safety contract, rendering the abstraction unsound and allowing safe clients to trigger undefined behavior. Detecting these potential soundness violations is challenging. Existing static analysis tools for C/C++ ignore Rust-specific safety contracts, while current Rust tools lack the deep semantic modeling required to track the contexts that raw pointers erase. To address this gap, we present UnsafeChecker, a compiler-integrated static analysis framework for detecting potential soundness violations in Rust safe abstractions. UnsafeChecker analyzes Rust MIR using a flow-sensitive abstract interpretation that maintains a shared state with three components: ownership, object validity, and layout. Each warning rule consumes the subset of facts needed for the corresponding Rust safety obligation. UnsafeChecker reports both instruction-level undefined behavior and boundary-level contract violations that may escape through safe APIs. We evaluate UnsafeChecker on a benchmark of 46 RustSec vulnerabilities, which contain 53 ground-truth bugs. UnsafeChecker outperforms several state-of-the-art tools, detecting 32 CVEs and covering 36 bugs (67.9% recall) with 51.6% alert-level precision. Furthermore, in a large-scale scan of real-world crates on crates.io, UnsafeChecker uncovered 114 previously unknown bugs across 83 crates, with 45 confirmed and 27 already fixed by maintainers.

cs.PL

Mapping Dynamic, Hierarchical Quantum Circuits

Qubit mapping is a critical pass in quantum compilation. Despite various advances, dynamic circuits, those exhibiting data dependent control-flow, often resulting from qubit measurements, are not yet supported by the vast majority of available qubit mappers. The crucial limitation to overcome is the dependence on flat, one-dimensional representations of circuits. Further, qubit mappers currently lack compiler abstractions that capture the hierarchical nature of circuits, hindering the qubit mapping process. In this paper, 1 we introduce a new qubit mapping method and analyses to tackle hierarchical dynamic circuits. Our novelty resides in four key aspects: modeling (statically) sub-circuits in disjoint control-flow paths, introducing a novel Qubit Reconciliation pass to maintain consistency between sub-circuit and control-flow boundaries, a loop-entry remapping pass, and a refined cost function enhanced for SWAP count, circuit depth, circuit latency and error. We demonstrate the efficiency of our approach on a wide range of dynamic circuits on two monolithic Quantum Processing Units of 127 and 156 qubits, and on chiplet hexagon-based QPUs. On monolithic QPUs, our qubit mapper improves the SWAP count by up to 52%, depth by up to 18%, latency by up to 18.6%, and error by up to 40%. On chiplet architectures, we achieve improvements of up to 36% on SWAP count, 8.7% on depth, 15% on latency, and 15% of error.

cs.PL

Erased Postulates, Identity Types and Quotients

This text is concerned with the question of whether, in type theory with erasure annotations, one can postulate that some type is inhabited and still have a guarantee that a program will not get stuck. Previous work has provided such guarantees for consistent erased postulates, i.e. postulates that are restricted to be used in erased contexts. Here those guarantees are extended to type theory with identity types. Similar ideas provide a simple way to support quotient types: it is shown that one can let things like "the equivalence classes for two related values are equal" be erased postulates and have an eliminator that only computes for the equivalence class constructor, and still get a guarantee that programs will compute correctly. Another question is whether programs compute correctly if one is allowed to transport (cast) using erased identity proofs. It is shown that this is safe in the absence of quotients and postulates, and in the presence of quotients and erased postulates that can be implemented using equality reflection. However, unrestricted transports of this kind are not compatible with erased, postulated univalence. For that reason the text includes a study of the function []-cong, which encapsulates a limited form of transport for erased identity proofs. The text is accompanied by machine-checked Agda proofs.

cs.PL