arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2606.02279

Counting Hamiltonian paths between prescribed vertices in traceable graphs with a forbidden induced subgraph

Abstract

For graphs $G$ and $F$, we say that $G$ is $F$-free if $F$ does not occur as an induced subgraph of $G$. This paper is concerned with the following question: Given an $F$-free graph $G$ having two vertices between which there exists at least one Hamiltonian path, how many Hamiltonian paths between these endpoints must exist (in terms of the order of $G$)? Our main result shows that there exists a sharp dichotomy. More precisely, we show that if $F$ is not an induced subgraph of $P_3+sP_1$ for any integer $s \geq 0$, then there exists an infinite family of $F$-free graphs having two vertices between which there exists a unique Hamiltonian path. On the other hand, we prove that if $F$ is an induced subgraph of $P_3+sP_1$ for some integer $s \geq 0$, then any $F$-free graph having two vertices between which there exists a Hamiltonian path contains exponentially many such paths between these two vertices. Our proofs use Ramsey-theoretic methods, a result on the existence of two vertices with low degree in graphs containing a unique Hamiltonian cycle, a path variant of Thomassen's red-independent weakly green-dominating sets, and a structural analysis of Hamiltonian paths in $P_3+sP_1$-free graphs. As an algorithmic consequence we obtain that for every fixed $s \geq 1$, given a Hamiltonian $sP_1$-free graph together with a Hamiltonian cycle, one can decide in linear time whether a second Hamiltonian cycle exists and construct one if it does.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jorik Jooken, Carol T. Zamfirescu. 2026-06-01. Counting Hamiltonian paths between prescribed vertices in traceable graphs with a forbidden induced subgraph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02279

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Small doublings in abelian groups of prime power torsion

Let $A$ be a subset of $G$, where $G$ is a finite abelian group of torsion $r$. It was conjectured by Ruzsa that if $|A+A|\leq K|A|$, then $A$ is contained in a coset of $G$ of size at most $r^{CK}|A|$ for some constant $C$. The case $r=2$ received considerable attention in a sequence of papers, and was resolved by Green and Tao. Recently, Even-Zohar and Lovett settled the case when $r$ is a prime. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture when $r$ is a power of prime. In particular, the bound we obtain is tight.

math.CO

Graph Polynomial for Colored Embedded Graphs: A Topological Approach

We study finite graphs embedded in oriented surfaces by associating a polynomial to it. The tools used in developing a theory of such graph polynomials are algebraic topological while the polynomial itself is inspired from ideas arising in physics. We also analyze a variant of these polynomials for colored embedded graphs. This is used to describe the change in the polynomial under basic graph theoretic operations. We conclude with several applications of this polynomial including detection of certain classes of graphs and the connection of this polynomial with topological entanglement entropy.

math.CO

Schur positivity of the spiders $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ via noncommutative symmetric functions

We prove that the spider graphs $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ are Schur positive for all integers $a\ge1$. Together with the known $e$-positivity results, this completes the $e$- and Schur-positivity classification of both families. Our approach uses noncommutative symmetric functions, including a particularly simple ribbon expansion for the path lift with coefficients given by powers of two. We give a new proof of the Shareshian--Wachs path formula at $t=1$ and construct corresponding lifts for spiders. The Littlewood--Richardson rule converts their ribbon expansions into a general Schur-coefficient formula in terms of weighted Yamanouchi words. Mass-preserving multi-injections and a reduction to finitely many inequalities in degree $10$ then prove the required positivity; exact computer verification of these inequalities completes the proof in full generality.

math.CO