arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.30626

Advancing Heliophysics and Space Weather Modeling through Open Science

C. Corti·M. M. Kuznetsova·M. A. Reiss·J. Yue·J. Karpen·C. N. Arge·F. Bacchini·C. Bard·S. Bruinsma·R. M. Caplan·L. K. S. Daldorff·P. J. Deka·C. R. DeVore·S. Elvidge·N. Ganushkina·J. D. Huba·B. V. Jackson·V. Jordanova·J. A. Linker·H. Liu·J. G. Luhmann·S. Markidis·P. Mayank·V. Merkin·N. Moens·D. Odstrcil·Y. A. Omelchenko·M. Palmroth·S. Poedts·A. J. Ridley·Y. Shou·V. Tenishev·D. R. Themens·G. Toth·W. Wang·R. -P. Wilhelm·M. A. Young·B. Cecconi·M. -Y. Chou·D. De Zeeuw·G. L. Delzanno·C. Didigu·M. El Alaoui·S. Fung·J. Green·Z. Huang·L. K. Jian·L. J. Landwer·M. Lesko·P. MacNeice·A. Masson·M. L. Mays·P. M. Mehta·M. S. Miesch·E. Palmerio·M. Petrenko·E. Provornikova·L. Rastätter·L. Rusaitis·N. Sachdeva·E. Samara·D. Sur·A. Taktakishvili·J. Topper·T. Tsui·C. Verbeke·J. Wang·C. Wiegand·M. Wiltberger·Y. Zheng·M. M. Bisi·M. K. Georgoulis·T. Kodikara·T. Pulkkinen·A. Chartier·D. da Silva·A. Faturahman·K. Garcia-Sage·D. Kondrashov·V. E. Ledvina·W. Liu·C. Pandey·E. Resnick·C. Shi·R. S. Weigel·K. Whitman·I. Zakharenkova·K. Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a community-wide effort to develop a strategy and action plan to advance heliophysics and space weather modeling through open science. While open science has the potential to enhance the quality and pace of scientific discovery, its application to scientific modeling requires more careful consideration regarding open data and open software guidelines, as scientific models differ significantly from data analysis software. We gathered feedback from modeling teams worldwide through a living survey and discussion sessions at the 2024 Open Science Workshop in College Park, USA, and at the 2025 COSPAR ISWAT Working Meeting in Cape Canaveral, USA. We complement these findings with lessons learned from almost 25 years of experience at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center in enabling open use of models. We identify key roadblocks in current open science practices and guidelines and offer recommendations for future progress across four overlapping themes: open use of models and simulation results, open validation, open development, and open collaboration. An essential outcome of the discussion is the need for model developers and model users to speak with a united voice and promote the role of models in future open science efforts. We introduce a new cross-domain community initiative called the Heliophysics Open Modeling Environment (HOME), which will be integrated as an overarching activity within COSPAR ISWAT. HOME will serve as a platform for modelers and model users to work together, facilitate community modeling, improve the scientific return on modeling investment, and advance understanding, modeling, and forecasting in heliophysics and space weather.

Explore related subjects

physics.space-phastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRphysics.comp-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

C. Corti, M. M. Kuznetsova, M. A. Reiss, J. Yue, J. Karpen, C. N. Arge, F. Bacchini, C. Bard, S. Bruinsma, R. M. Caplan, L. K. S. Daldorff, P. J. Deka, C. R. DeVore, S. Elvidge, N. Ganushkina, J. D. Huba, B. V. Jackson, V. Jordanova, J. A. Linker, H. Liu, J. G. Luhmann, S. Markidis, P. Mayank, V. Merkin, N. Moens, D. Odstrcil, Y. A. Omelchenko, M. Palmroth, S. Poedts, A. J. Ridley, Y. Shou, V. Tenishev, D. R. Themens, G. Toth, W. Wang, R. -P. Wilhelm, M. A. Young, B. Cecconi, M. -Y. Chou, D. De Zeeuw, G. L. Delzanno, C. Didigu, M. El Alaoui, S. Fung, J. Green, Z. Huang, L. K. Jian, L. J. Landwer, M. Lesko, P. MacNeice, A. Masson, M. L. Mays, P. M. Mehta, M. S. Miesch, E. Palmerio, M. Petrenko, E. Provornikova, L. Rastätter, L. Rusaitis, N. Sachdeva, E. Samara, D. Sur, A. Taktakishvili, J. Topper, T. Tsui, C. Verbeke, J. Wang, C. Wiegand, M. Wiltberger, Y. Zheng, M. M. Bisi, M. K. Georgoulis, T. Kodikara, T. Pulkkinen, A. Chartier, D. da Silva, A. Faturahman, K. Garcia-Sage, D. Kondrashov, V. E. Ledvina, W. Liu, C. Pandey, E. Resnick, C. Shi, R. S. Weigel, K. Whitman, I. Zakharenkova, K. Zhang. 2026-05-28. Advancing Heliophysics and Space Weather Modeling through Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025sw004922

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Cascade models of anisotropic turbulence in magnetized plasma of solar wind

We present a physical framework for Alfv\'enic solar wind turbulence in which the plasma is modeled as discrete domains with local rotational symmetry about the domain-mean magnetic field. Using this symmetry, we construct minimalist cascade models governed by two characteristic time scales, nonlinear and Alfv\'enic, associated, respectively, with the perpendicular and parallel directions relative to the domain-mean magnetic field. Within this partial symmetry, we also characterize the anisotropy of each domain by a single additional geometrical parameter, the alignment angle between the domain-mean velocity and magnetic fields. We introduce a stochastic renewal process with a bimodal waiting-time distribution based on these two time scales, yielding a two-branch renormalization solution for the total energy cascade: a statistically robust branch with an Iroshnikov-Kraichnan-like $k^{-3/2}$ spectrum, and a statistically marginal branch with a Kolmogorov-like $k^{-5/3}$ spectrum. Utilizing principles of causality and cascade stability, we show that the system selects the faster cascade rate between the two available whenever energy-flux fluctuations become supercritical, preventing intermittent flux accumulation. Consequently, during solar wind expansion, balanced domains (with low cross-helicity) undergo a first-order phase transition from the slow $k^{-3/2}$ cascade to the fast $k^{-5/3}$ cascade. The transition is accelerated by heterogeneous nucleation at switchbacks. Incorporating a forward magnetic helicity cascade slaved to the energy cascade, we show that the large-scale spectra decouple into a flat $k^{-3/4}$ magnetic spectrum and a $k^{-3/2}$ kinetic spectrum. Data from Voyager, Ulysses, Helios, Wind, and PSP confirm these spectral signatures across diverse heliospheric regions.

physics.space-ph↗
arXiv2026

AETHER-P3 Nowcast v1.0: Model Description, Training-Data Construction, and Validation Technical report prepared in support of CCMC onboarding

AETHER-P\textsuperscript{3} Nowcast v1.0 is a machine-learning-based global thermospheric neutral-density model developed for low-Earth-orbit applications and prepared for onboarding to NASA's Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC). The model provides pointwise neutral-density estimates together with predictive uncertainty using a deep evidential regression framework driven by causal solar, solar-wind, geomagnetic, spatial, temporal, and empirical-model inputs. This report documents the released model configuration, training-data construction, software traceability, output products, validation strategy, benchmark performance, and known limitations. The training archive combines accelerometer- and mission-derived density observations from CHAMP, GRACE-A, GOCE, Swarm-C, and GRACE-FO spanning 2000--2023. More than 40 million eligible 30-s observations are available, but the archive is strongly dominated by consecutive quiet-time measurements. To preserve coverage of physically important regimes, the final 1.67-million-sample training set is constructed using deterministic regime-aware sampling that progressively subsamples quiet conditions while retaining all available extreme-condition observations. Validation uses temporally disjoint chronological blocks with exclusion guards to reduce information leakage. Evaluation across quiet, moderate, and extreme conditions shows competitive performance relative to HASDM, JB2008, NRLMSISE-00, and available WAM-IPE cases, while also identifying limitations associated with sparse training coverage, mission-dependent density products, and condition-dependent uncertainty calibration. The report provides a reproducible technical description of the AETHER-P\textsuperscript{3} Nowcast v1.0 research release and its current CCMC onboarding configuration.

physics.space-ph↗
arXiv2026

Direct Four-Spacecraft Measurement of Reconnection Exhaust Thickness in the Solar Wind

The thickness of a reconnecting solar wind current sheet is normally inferred from a single spacecraft as the product of the boundary-normal speed and the crossing duration. Multipoint measurements have tested this method for generic solar wind current sheets and constrained the geometry of reconnection exhausts, but a direct comparison with single-spacecraft thickness estimates for the same reconnection-associated crossings is still lacking. We analyze four current-sheet crossings observed by Magnetospheric Multiscale in the pristine solar wind on 2017 November 10 the two boundaries of a confirmed reconnection exhaust and two nearby current sheets. The tetrahedron separation was $\approx 16$ km. Cross-correlation of the magnetic-field ramps gives millisecond-level lag uncertainties, boundary normals to $4^\circ-8^\circ$ and speeds to $5\%-8\%$, while single-threshold timing at these separations is noise dominated. The exhaust edges are 29-31 ion inertial lengths ($d_i$) thick. The two edge normals differ by $22^\circ$ (68% interval [$19^\circ,26^\circ$]), resolving a nonparallel exhaust geometry. At the exhaust edges, the measured boundary speeds agree with three standard single-spacecraft estimates to 4%-15% and remain within about one Alfv\'en speed of the plasma motion. Estimating the normal from one spacecraft is the larger source of error, though the thickness is still recovered to within tens of percent when a degenerate minimum-variance solution is rejected. At the actively reconnecting sheet, the boundary speed exceeds the local plasma speed along the normal by $29\% \pm 10\%$.

physics.space-ph↗