arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2605.27605

Laguna M.1/XS.2 Technical Report

Julien Abadji·Marah Abdin·Connor Adams·Eric Alcaide·Mustafa Altun·Michele Artoni·Junze Bao·Uday Barar·Vassilis Bekiaris·Arkadii Bessonov·Benjamin Bütikofer·Jonathan Chang·Yen-Chun Chen·Dmitry Chernenkov·Yang Chi·Filippos Christianos·Fenia Christopoulou·Razvan-Andrei Ciocoiu·Tzachi Cohen·Yohann Coppel·Dmitrii Emelianenko·Brandon Fergerson·Brian Fitzgerald·Matthias Gallé·Alex Golonzovskyi·George Grigorev·Yiyang Hao·Christian Hensel·Jan Huenermann·Ye Ji·Sarthak Joshi·Eiso Kant·Kabir Khandpur·Seonghyeon Kim·Vladimir Kirichenko·Umut Kocasarac·Ilya Kochik·Ivan Komarov·Chaerin Kong·Anurag Koul·François-Joseph Lacroix·Sergei Laktionov·Waren Long·Quentin Malartic·Vadim Markovtsev·Afonso Marques·Robert McHardy·Carlos Mocholí·Dmitry Monakhov·Adam Morris·Martin Muller·Christian Mürtz·Robin Nabel·Thien Nguyen·Rok Novosel·Szymon Ozog·Aalhad Patankar·Aleksei Petrov·Alexandre Piché·Arthur Pignet·Teodor Poncu·Phil Potter·Alexander Rakowski·Pierre-Yves Ritschard·Jay Roberts·Joe Rowell·Piotr Sarna·Pierre-André Savalle·Uladzislau Sazanovich·Nikita Shapovalov·Arsenii Shevchenko·Mikhail Shilkov·Andrei Sokol·Mohamed Soliman·Jack Stephenson·Victor Storchan·Dragos-Constantin Tantaru·Artem Tyurin·Adrian Wälchli·Pengming Wang·Jianxiao Yang·Renat Zayashnikov·Alexander Zelenka Martin·Nikolay Zinov·Caroline Bercier·José Caldeira·Margarida Garcia·Tom George·Kabeer Gharzai·Glenn Hitchcock·Carson Klingenberg·Ivo Pinto·Varun Randery·Noah Smith·Arina Sugako·Jason Warner

Abstract

We present Laguna M.1 and Laguna XS.2, two Mixture-of-Experts foundation models built for long-horizon, agentic coding: M.1 has $225.8$B total parameters ($23.4$B activated per token) and XS.2 has $33.4$B total ($3$B activated). Both models were trained from scratch end-to-end inside the same internal system that we refer to as our Model Factory: a tightly-integrated stack of versioned data, training, evaluation, and inference components that turn model development into an industrial process. We describe the principles and design choices of the Model Factory and also detail the end-to-end training process of our models, throughout pre-training data and architecture, post-training stages, evaluation, and quantization. On agentic software engineering and terminal benchmarks (SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, and Terminal-Bench 2.0) M.1 and XS.2 are competitive with state-of-the-art open models in their respective weight classes. Laguna XS.2 weights are released under Apache~2.0 at https://huggingface.co/collections/poolside/laguna-xs2.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Julien Abadji, Marah Abdin, Connor Adams, Eric Alcaide, Mustafa Altun, Michele Artoni, Junze Bao, Uday Barar, Vassilis Bekiaris, Arkadii Bessonov, Benjamin Bütikofer, Jonathan Chang, Yen-Chun Chen, Dmitry Chernenkov, Yang Chi, Filippos Christianos, Fenia Christopoulou, Razvan-Andrei Ciocoiu, Tzachi Cohen, Yohann Coppel, Dmitrii Emelianenko, Brandon Fergerson, Brian Fitzgerald, Matthias Gallé, Alex Golonzovskyi, George Grigorev, Yiyang Hao, Christian Hensel, Jan Huenermann, Ye Ji, Sarthak Joshi, Eiso Kant, Kabir Khandpur, Seonghyeon Kim, Vladimir Kirichenko, Umut Kocasarac, Ilya Kochik, Ivan Komarov, Chaerin Kong, Anurag Koul, François-Joseph Lacroix, Sergei Laktionov, Waren Long, Quentin Malartic, Vadim Markovtsev, Afonso Marques, Robert McHardy, Carlos Mocholí, Dmitry Monakhov, Adam Morris, Martin Muller, Christian Mürtz, Robin Nabel, Thien Nguyen, Rok Novosel, Szymon Ozog, Aalhad Patankar, Aleksei Petrov, Alexandre Piché, Arthur Pignet, Teodor Poncu, Phil Potter, Alexander Rakowski, Pierre-Yves Ritschard, Jay Roberts, Joe Rowell, Piotr Sarna, Pierre-André Savalle, Uladzislau Sazanovich, Nikita Shapovalov, Arsenii Shevchenko, Mikhail Shilkov, Andrei Sokol, Mohamed Soliman, Jack Stephenson, Victor Storchan, Dragos-Constantin Tantaru, Artem Tyurin, Adrian Wälchli, Pengming Wang, Jianxiao Yang, Renat Zayashnikov, Alexander Zelenka Martin, Nikolay Zinov, Caroline Bercier, José Caldeira, Margarida Garcia, Tom George, Kabeer Gharzai, Glenn Hitchcock, Carson Klingenberg, Ivo Pinto, Varun Randery, Noah Smith, Arina Sugako, Jason Warner. 2026-05-26. Laguna M.1/XS.2 Technical Report. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27605

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI